Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,701   Posts: 1,482,641   Online: 726
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    35
    Images
    14

    My change of lens direction

    I thought of calling this thread turning japanese , Which is a popular song from the 70's . But in light of light of the recent developments, i found it in bad taste .When i first got involved in large format photographyI was told you must buy Schneider or Rodenstock because european is the way to go. So when a hapless vendor suggested i look at Fujinon i was reluctant to take the step, I am glad i did , because in my humble opinion the Japanese lens manufactures cater for landscape photographers better , I have gone from a must have European to a person who has 75 % of my lens collection based in Japan. The lenses are every bit as good as the european counterparts, With in IMHO some coverage and weight advantages. My Japanese collection is as follows (i shoot both 5x4 & 5x8)90mm f8Nikkor, 135f5.6 Nikkor ,120f8Nikkor ,450mf9 Nikkor 240a f9Fujinon,300c f8.5 Fujinon 150 Fujinon f6.3(very first lens i ever bought made in Japan), I do own 3 european lenses a 58SA 75SA and a symmer s 180 all Schneider , I have never owned a Rodenstock lens !! Not for any reason just the s/h market in Aus seems to have more Schneiders Cheers Gary

  2. #2
    Worker 11811's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,618
    Almost all lenses used in modern cinema projection are made by Isco Optic which is now owned by Schneider-Kreuznach. They are such the standard in projection that, when you walk into a projection room and look for the lens, you expect to find an Isco/Schneider. They are also, pretty much, the standard on Hollywood movie sets, these days, as well.

    However, Japanese manufacturers ain't no slouches, neither. When it came time to choose a new lens for my enlarger, I ended up having to make a choice between a Schnieder and a Nikkor. I thought long and hard about the question. I ended up buying the Nikkor and I was not disappointed.
    Randy S.

    In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.

    -----

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/randystankey/

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,288
    It all comes down to personal preference in the end, doesn't it? All my LF lenses are Schneiders. My first lens was a Schneider, and I stuck with the brand through six purchases, new and used, all from the same era, the 1980s. I have not been disappointed once.

    I've worked in a studio that used all Nikon LF glass. I've met photographers who use only Nikon glass. I've seen work from Fuji LF glass. Not once could I stand in front of a picture and tell you what brand of lens made it. My personal lens choices were made from experience with one maker and a desire to be consistent. I doubt anyone could stand in front of any of my pictures and tell you what brand of lens made it.

    Your pictures have more to do with you than with your gear.

    Peter Gomena

  4. #4
    brucemuir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Metro DC area, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,264
    Images
    4
    Do you people think there is a different design philosophy between Japan and German lens manufacturers.
    I don't have extensive LF experience (all my 4x5 work was with american single coated optics) but I have used a wide variety of 120 and 135 systems.

    It seems that Japanese optics favor sharpness over "character".
    Maybe this is too general a statement but I've noticed it comparing mamiya 645 to 6x6 Zeiss/hasselblad,

  5. #5
    Klainmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,493
    Images
    30
    There is definitely a distinct difference between my Mamiya 7 lenses and my old Zeiss lenses. Hard to pin down....more contrasty, sharp and cool if that makes sense. Either way, both are phenomenal and I don't think any of do ourselves a favor by not experimenting. Find what works, use it, and always tinker on the side....ya never know.
    K.S. Klain

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    35
    Images
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by pgomena View Post
    It all comes down to personal preference in the end, doesn't it? All my LF lenses are Schneiders. My first lens was a Schneider, and I stuck with the brand through six purchases, new and used, all from the same era, the 1980s. I have not been disappointed once.

    I've worked in a studio that used all Nikon LF glass. I've met photographers who use only Nikon glass. I've seen work from Fuji LF glass. Not once could I stand in front of a picture and tell you what brand of lens made it. My personal lens choices were made from experience with one maker and a desire to be consistent. I doubt anyone could stand in front of any of my pictures and tell you what brand of lens made it.

    Your pictures have more to do with you than with your gear.

    Peter Gomena
    I could not agree more, Exactly !! the point i am trying to make, But what lens does Schneider make for the backpacking photographer from the 240-450 range ???That is why i went Fujinon compare my old symmer S with my current 240a Fujinon well the shutter size says it all 0 versus 3!, Don't get me wrong i have a great respect for the Schneider product , But it is horses for courses , and size and weight are a major criteria for me . Cheers Gary

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    35
    Images
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by brucemuir View Post
    Do you people think there is a different design philosophy between Japan and German lens manufacturers.
    I don't have extensive LF experience (all my 4x5 work was with american single coated optics) but I have used a wide variety of 120 and 135 systems.

    It seems that Japanese optics favor sharpness over "character".
    Maybe this is too general a statement but I've noticed it comparing mamiya 645 to 6x6 Zeiss/hasselblad,
    Hi Bruce, Yes this is probably the way most people would say the difference is . But it is more about contrast , i would say in some instances but not all Japanese lenses tend to be more contrasty . What we tend to do these days is modify some of these things in PS anyhow.Remember for me its all about Size/Weight. Cheers Gary

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,264
    Strange, in small format the opposite is usually observed. Leica and Zeiss lenses were always shown to be more contrasty than Nikon, Canon etc, although there is likely no longer much of a difference.

  9. #9
    holmburgers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Rochester NY (native KS)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,400
    Images
    2
    Umut, a member that you guy's might know, has a very interesting philosophy on the difference in character between East Asian & European lenses.

    I hope he chimes in, but basically he asserts that lens makers have choices when designing their lenses and in ye olden days before computer design came into play, these decisions were very much influenced by the individuals. Their choices were based off of the history of art; the culture that a particular lens maker came from defined the colors that were most appealing. Hence, European lenses favor a "Byzantine" look that is strong in reds, yellows, browns; tones of the land. Japan lenses favor blues, greens; tones of the sea.

    An intriguing theory if nothing else.
    If you are the big tree, we are the small axe

  10. #10
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,413
    Images
    104
    Chris ,

    Thank you , you summarized what I think of art history and lens history. Everyday I put a new milestep when I am researching art technology. Production of colored things started with rock paintings to pottery making. Pottery firing and glazing is approximately 10000 years old at the world and I believe Shan culture of Northeast China influenced the Greek pottery in 2000 years. Well archaeology is not very old science and people shifted their views strongly in time. When you look at Oxford Cambridge books , they try to brain wash as history or beauty started from greeks. But Romans and Middle Ages have more influence on color theory at europe. I am researching church paintings , glasses , sculptures and architecture was the library which era scientists put their knowledge on to stone.

    If you have will to study this , you will find colors are used as soldiers and there are strong backup behind of colors , degrades , contrast selection , etc. and art.

    I believe Kodak have more influence on foreign coutries than cia. You and I have strong brain washing towards the kodak colors and we strongly defend the analog because of it.

    Same as lenses. Take few shots with Leica and put in a gallery , people instantly recognize it.

    Umut

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin