Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,754   Posts: 1,515,924   Online: 1039
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    305

    So one has got to go: caltar ii-n 150mm or ebc 135mm fujinon w

    So I'm trying to thin the heard of large format lenses I own and wann keep just one... Which one do I keep

    Caltar ii-n 150mm or fujinon w 135mm mc

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,307
    The one with the largest image circle.

    Peter Gomena

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    305
    Quote Originally Posted by pgomena View Post
    The one with the largest image circle.

    Peter Gomena
    image circle is the practically the same... 206mm vs 214mm

    fujinon w 135mm in copal 0 with metal ring ebc coated with 52mm filter ring = 206mm

    rodenstock non apo sironar N MC 150mm with 49mm filter ring = 214mm ic (not caltar ii N)

  4. #4
    wiseowl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    S Wales
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    423
    Images
    3
    So where do you live and what are you asking for them?
    I'm Spartacus!

  5. #5
    Rick A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    north central Pa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,783
    Images
    31
    It all depends on what you shoot most. If you shoot landscapes and architecture primarily, then a slightly wide angle of the 135 would be preferred. If you shoot a mix of subjects and portraiture, the 150 may be more versitile.
    Rick A
    Argentum aevum
    BTW: the big kid in my avatar is my hero, my son, who proudly serves us in the Navy. "SALUTE"

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    305
    Yeah I think I'm gonna stick with the 135... I like the slight wider angle and it looks like the coating on the Fuji is nicer than the non-apo sironar

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Monterey Co, CA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    303

    APO designation

    The Sironar N's had no changes to their specs other than name when they went "APO". I have two Caltar IIN versions and they're very fine lenses indeed.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,307
    As Rick said above. 135 is in the middle of the focal length range for 4x5 cameras. It's a slightly wide normal. You have plenty of room on either side for a shorter or longer addition to your kit when you feel the need. I prefer a 150, but only because I have a 120 and a 210. A 135 would be a bit redundant for me. You may choose to go with a 90 and 180 as additional lenses. It's nice to have choices.

    Peter Gomena

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    305
    Well I already have a 90, 180, 210, 250, and 305 oh and a 240 g claron for 8x10 so I don't need both the 135 and 150

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    421
    With that spread I'd keep the 150 and sell the 135 and the 180. But what I would really do is very careful testing on all the lenes and see what ones are really sharp. Then cul from the sharpnest list. Depending on how that shakes out you might have a standard 90-150-210-305 group or a 135-180-250.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin