Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,953   Posts: 1,194,995   Online: 911
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,270
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    That one is very very simple to determine the f-stops on:

    The lens focal length is 300m, that is clearly marked on it.

    The f-stop is the diameter of the effective aperture divided by the focal length - or to get the f-number, take 300mm/diameter. Since there is no glass in front of the aperture, the effective diameter of the entrance pupil is identical to the diameter of the aperture opening - as a circle, but the aperture is close enough to a circle to make the difference negligible.

    Simply measure the size of the opening, and divide 300 by that number in mm. I have a cheap plastic measuring thingy which is perfect for the purpose - I think I bought it in Clas Olson.
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  2. #12
    Two23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    109
    I have the 250mm Imagon. As I recall, the lens is f4.5 without any disks in it. The lens was made in several lengths. The 200mm was used on medium format, the 250mm on 4x5, the 300mm covers 5x7, and the 360mm covers 8x10. This seems to be a challenging lens to learn, but then again I don't shoot portraits and have been using it for b&w landscapes.


    Kent in SD

  3. #13
    masimix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    51
    So Ole, in norwegian:

    Jeg måler diameteren på åpningen og deler 300 på tallet? F.eks, full åpning er ca 40mm - 300/40=7,5 - f7,5. Minimum åpning ca 2mm - f150..?

    And what if the disc is still on, should be extremely little light passing through?

  4. #14
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,270
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    det stemmer, det! Med disken på, blir det mer komplisert: Husk at åpningen der er konstant, så du skal IKKE addere. Hvis blenderåpningen er mindre enn hullet i skiven er det blenderen som dominerer, hvis blenderen er mer åpen er det skiven som dominerer. Ekstra ille blir det hvis blenderåpningen dekker deler as de ytre hullene! Det ekleste er nok å bruke den ene eller den andre, ikke begge samtidig...
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  5. #15
    masimix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    51
    Okei, takk, da sier vi det, enten den ene eller andre.. Det holder med discen regner jeg med.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin