Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,951   Posts: 1,194,967   Online: 975
      
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22
  1. #21

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Earth
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    94
    Since you're still thinking about it. . . nothing says you can't approach 8x10 from the bottom, as I did. Not too many years ago I started with an old rickety 8x10 holder found in an antique store for a buck. A little research and I discovered that a B&L lens from an old Kodak folder covered 8x10. Some pine wood, some basic plans for a bellows, and I was off and running. Over several months I fabricated three 8x10 cameras around that humble combination. Even today I still use the same lens and holders, albeit on a manufactured camera. What can I say . . . I love the look that only an imperfect lens can produce. Of course I have accumulated other items since, but for the most part everything serves double-duty for other formats. . tripods, film, lenses, etc. Most of the adventure is in just getting there. (the voyage)

    Besides . . . "You'll never be truly satisfied, 'til you've killed that rat."
    Last edited by X. Phot.; 10-28-2011 at 12:29 PM. Reason: Keyboard still cain't spell.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san jose, ca
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,162
    Images
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by vyshemirsky View Post
    It is all quite tempting, but indeed, I see 4x5 as a more universal format. You still get all of the benefits of using a viewcamera, while having so much more convenience when printing.
    My only problem is enlarging negatives for alternative processes, but that step may be much simpler and cheaper than shooting a larger format.

    Conclusion: 8x10 is tempting, but I have to wait and see how I feel about it.
    Of course it is your choice and it's good to see someone not running with the herd but...

    There is a measurable difference between 4x5 blown up and 8x10 contact prints. Flying Camera had it pretty much nailed. 8x10 prints are displayable but hand held, examining the print (which you will want to do) reveals all the intimate details that film can produce. There is a living depth to the image that isn't apparent in 4x5 enlarged.

    Shoot a nice 50-100 speed B&W film in 8x10 and you will think you have walked into the scene. Literally walked in.

    Best of luck. Get your 4x5 because you will then use it. Nothing is worse than an 8x10 sitting in the closet.

    tim in san jose
    Last edited by k_jupiter; 10-28-2011 at 12:22 PM. Reason: speling of corse
    Where ever you are, there you be.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin