Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,951   Posts: 1,194,968   Online: 977
      
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25
  1. #21
    Martin Aislabie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Stratford-upon-Avon, England
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,384
    Quote Originally Posted by Takizawa View Post
    Assuming a new (not used) camera:
    Which 4x5 view camera do you think provides greatest value per dollar and why? Assume the main purpose is for Landscape photography.

    Note: Even if this question was posed before I value your current-day opinions! Thanks!!
    The question is really impossible to answer - the things you will need from a LF camera will be different from mine or indeed anyone elses - because what you shoot and how you shoot it, you will have unique requirements from your camera.

    Having said all that, for a solid, well made landscape camera it is hard to beat the Walker Titan SF - http://www.walkercameras.com/SF.html

    It will take just about every focal length you might want to shoot landscapes with.

    It has enough movements to satisfy almost all landscape applications

    However, its biggest selling point is its rock solid stability - which is a major factor in LF Cameras.

    Being made out of ABS Plastic and Stainless Steel it isn't affected by the atmospheric conditions the way wooden field cameras are - so shooting in the deserts of the south west isn't going to cause it to go loose and wobbly plus the wet conditions east of Seattle isn't going to made it stiff and difficult to adjust.

    They are more money than something like a Shen Hao - but it will last you a life time and be just as usable as the day you bought it

    If you don't want to buy internationally (which is very easy) - try talking to Jeff at Badger - he will probably be able to get one for you

    Good luck

    Martin

  2. #22
    EASmithV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,284
    Blog Entries
    4
    Images
    79
    throw in another vote for the graflex
    "Hit 'em with a Speed Graphic"

    "The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera."
    — Dorothea Lange

    "Film is to digital as a symphony orchestra is to a kazoo" - Brian C. Miller

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/easmithv/
    RIP Kodachrome

  3. #23
    Jim Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rural NW Missouri
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,419
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick A View Post
    I think what we are all getting at here is, decide what features you want in a LF camera. What will its primary use be, how portable does it have to be, etc. Then do a bunch of homework, study as many types and brands, and configurations, as to what will possibly do most of what you desire. There is never one camera that does it all[conveniently], then ask your question as to which is the "best bang for the buck". You will still get more answeres than you need, and possibly more confusion.
    These are the most important considerations. Do your homework! Understand any camera, especially used a one, that you intend to buy before spending money. Sometimes used cameras are missing significant parts such as tripod mounts. Many cameras use lens boards that are readily available or easy to fabricate. Others use esoteric boards that are scarce and expensive. Having the money to always buy new equipment lets one acquire much needed knowledge after purchasing the camera, but that can be an expensive, time consuming, and frustrating education. Having the perfect camera is not nearly as important as being the perfect photographer. In most circumstances, a new $4000 camera will produce no better photos than some well-used $100 models. It may be more convenient to use, but that saves only a small part of the effort that goes into producing most fine photographs. Consider the photographs you intend to make. If they will be huge prints hung in major galleries and museums, top quality lenses might be important and fine camera bodies nice. However, the most expensive prints on the market were sometimes photographed with mediocre equipment.

    If owning the newest, most expensive, and best equipment is more important than justifying it with great photos, I apologize for wasting your time.

  4. #24
    Rick A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    north central Pa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,540
    Images
    7
    Sage advice, Mr. Jones.
    Rick A
    Argentum aevum
    BTW: the big kid in my avatar is my hero, my son, who proudly serves us in the Navy. "SALUTE"

    "Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  5. #25
    mjs
    mjs is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Elkhart, Indiana (USA)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    836
    Images
    2
    In my case it would undoubtedly have been the Calumet CC-400 monorail I bought from Ebay for the princely sum of $27 ($36 including shipping) a number of years ago. There was nothing wrong with it. I coupled it with a Fujinon 150mm f/6.3 lens in Supermatic shutter that cost me $63 and was in business. I was going through a period of very little spare money at the time, so this was a welcome find for me.

    From the perspective of a new camera, I would have say that the answer for the vast majority of us would be 'whatever camera you have or can get.' I don't think there's really all that much difference between them, to be honest. You need a camera in order to take the picture; beyond that, whatever you can afford and are pleased to use is likely to be the 'best' one for you.

    Mike
    Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming– “Wow! What a Ride!”

    — Hunter S. Thompson

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin