If money was no object ?

[intratom]

Simple question, not always an easy answer. I often ponder this as I browse eBay and the like. What would you set yourself up with and why ?

Photography related of course !

[BrianShaw]

For me the answer is easy. I need nothing more than I already have.

[tony lockerbie]

Like Brian I'm lucky enough to have all the user gear that I need...maybe a 10x8 Deardorf... As a part time collector a nice Alpa 6C outfit would fit nicely.

[cliveh]

For me the answer is easy. I need nothing more than I already have.

+1

[Mainecoonmaniac]

This of course.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Huge-lot-of-...013023?afsrc=1

I don't feel so bad about having so many cameras now

[zsas]

I'd buy some materials I've never tried, like Brovira paper just to see its qualities. I would never waste my money on materials like that now due to high prices these things often get up to and possibility of it being fogged, etc. HIE and EIR film comes to mind too. Stuff like that, nothing fancy, just more inquisitive materials to experiment and learn about. But I'm fine now not splurging on things like this...

[bdial]

I have more cameras than I know what to do with already, but if I could go spurge on anything, I'd buy a Ritter 7x17

[winger]

There's nothing I really need. If I had money to spare, I'd pay someone to help around the house and with my little one so I could have more than two days a week to do photography ('cause those two days frequently get eaten up with non-photo things that are easier to do without Nate here).
And an 8x10 field camera (without more time to use it, there's no point in getting one now, though).

[Gerald C Koch]

This is the only digital camera that I would consider http://www.photographydailynews.com/...igital-camera/

[Ken Nadvornick]

What would you set yourself up with and why ?

Photography related of course !

Free time...

That's all I want.

Ken