I've used 20x24 frames/mattes for 16x20 prints in the past for shows because being standard size, everything can be cheaper. I used to feel like it was a bit tight, but was told by a number of people in the exhibition and art community not to worry about it for shows - if someone wants to buy a print, you can have one framed for them any way they want.


Adv Reply
) of both purchaser and creator. Heck, why not just invite buyers into your lab to help you determine cropping under the enlarger, contrast, areas of dodging and burning, or other manipulations? Many people, because of ignorance or heedlessness, throw bare prints into a frame squished directly against the glazing (including me on occasion ...OK, it was a small inkjet print in a dime store portrait frame of my dog at the river). All those "archival" print treatments so vehemently touted and argued in classical photography forums are then just so much hot air. All that seems to speak more of a concession to commercialism than it does of professionalism. OTOH, one might possibly care enough about their work to decide on its eventual size and content without the participation and judgement of others.





