Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,904   Posts: 1,584,571   Online: 1058
      
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678
Results 71 to 79 of 79
  1. #71
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,919
    I have a single frame Tessina, three 35mm cameras, two Hasselblads and two 4"x5" cameras, so I do not need to be an equipment snob.
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  2. #72
    Mark Fisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,641
    Images
    152
    I'm not sure I've met someone who I thought was an equipment snob in the film world (probably says I'm one of them!) Personally, I've tended to get beat up versions of very durable cameras, get them overhauled and use them. Even a Hasselblad or a Leica can be had for less than a decent DSLR.....of course if you want modern conveniences like built in light meters......
    Your first 10,000 pictures are the worst - HCB

    www.markjamesfisher.com

  3. #73
    David T T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    10
    I've never been a gear snob, in music (mostly) or photography. It's all about picking an acceptable point of diminishing returns. I picked up an RB67 when I got the photo bug again because it has "very good" lenses (Sekor C) that can be serviced nearly forever, it was cheap, and it is extremely versatile. I'm sure an RZ or Hasselblad would have technically superior lenses, but in the real world it will never make an artistic difference imo.

    I also grabbed an Olympus XA for street photography. Cheap, compact/stealthy, easy to use with one hand, and a very good lens.

  4. #74
    Jim Taylor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    West Yorkshire, UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    138
    I don't think I'm a gear snob, but I admit, I don't tend to buy 'off-brand' - I think the branded gear just 'does it's thing' better... does that make me a snob? Can't help feeling there may be some thinking "a fool and his money..."
    Cheers,

    Jim.

  5. #75
    Mainecoonmaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,195
    Images
    6
    I'm more like 7-Up. Never had it..never will. I'm still gonna shoot with my Chinese Rollei.
    "Photography, like surfing, is an infinite process, a constantly evolving exploration of life."
    Aaron Chang

  6. #76
    Roger Thoms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    San Francisco, CA USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    860
    Images
    7
    I pretty much look down on anyone who's not shooting WP with an old 2D that has pinhole in the bellows, so yes I guess I'm a equipment snob.

    Roger

  7. #77

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lower Earth
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,279
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    32
    Nah, I'm no equipment snob. That sounds back a**wards to me. I'm an image snob. Who cares how the image was made? It's like looking at my paint brushes and thinking "boy, that sure is a nice sable brush!" Yes, it is. Soooooo, what have I done w/ it?

    Not even in my wildest dreams can I imagine someone coming up to me, even, (or maybe especially) another photographer or painter, and saying "wow, that's a great painting. What brush did you use?" Think about it. It sounds really stupid. But like all artists, I wouldn't trust anything that I say. If someone showed me a great photo (vs a painting) I'd bet you a dollar to a donut that the first thing out of my mouth would be "wow, that's a great shot. What camera/lens did you use?" Sigh.
    Last edited by momus; 11-19-2013 at 10:07 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  8. #78

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,564
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Fisher View Post
    I'm not sure I've met someone who I thought was an equipment snob in the film world.
    I have, alas, two of them, if by film you mean still photography. Both were Leica fanatics. I'm not sure I've met a motion picture equipment snob, but I started shooting films around the time S8 died and met few other people who shot it. I met the most memorable of them, a German, twice. Once, at Volcan Irazu's summit. There I was with a Beaulieu 5008 on a tripod, when a tour bus came up and disgorged a small pack of Germans, including a man carrying a 6008. I ran into him again several years later in Asuncion. He was in another pack of German tourists, this time carrying a Nizo.

    My first first Leicanut friend tore himself apart with indecision. His wife was pregnant (first child), he wanted to shoot home movies of the newborn when it arrived, and he couldn't decide between the top-of-the-line Bauer and Nizo S8 cameras and an S8 Leicina. Leica isn't spelled Bauer or Nizo but Bauer and Nizo made S8 cameras that were more capable than the Leicina. What to do? What do do? He pushed me hard to get a Leicaflex SL; not possible, too expensive. By him, people who bought an affordable Japanese camera instead of bankrupting themselves to buy a Leica were themselves hopelessly second-best or worse. That's me.

    The other was a mad psychiatrist, a thread-mount Leica fanatic who thought that only inferior people used other cameras. That's me. He wanted to get the best out of his equipment (there was nothing better than his gear, he said) so shot H&W Control Film and processed it in H & W Control developer. Remember them? Agfa microfilm and a developer for continuous tone that oxidized immediately the ampoule was opened. Naturally he shot hand-held.

  9. #79

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,599
    Images
    112
    I have always made it a point to use the absolutely best gear for the intended outcome. I have done this because for me photography has always been my livelihood and anything that gave me a better result easier, faster and more reliably was always of benefit to me. This has not been a particularly cost effective way to work though.

    I think the word snob has a connotation that is more about having a sense of superiority because you have better gear. I've seen awesome work done with the worst of gear. A good story about this was one I heard about Irving Penn from a former assistant of mine who later assisted Penn. It seems on his first day working for Penn he noticed in the studio a rickety tripod with I think an old Deardorf on it, Hanging above the set was one of those cheap clamp reflector lights you would buy at the hardware store. He assumed that the light was just a focus light, but when Mr. Penn arrived to work on the set it was that cheap light that was the actual light source for the image. Apparently it had the quality of light that Mr. Penn wanted for the scene.

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin