Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,205   Posts: 1,531,752   Online: 894
      
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37
  1. #1
    JBrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,780

    How to Figure Friggin Focal length and f Stop Thingies.


  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Eastern, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,020
    Images
    55
    yeh Jason, i kinda unnerstand

    you've worked out the relative f stops

    i'm a liddle confused, is that relative to pasta divided cheetohs or is it relative to your mum's door?

    Ray

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Washington DC area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    596
    interesting...but the f-stop calculation doesn't seem to work on a known lens I tested -- is this only for a certain type of lens?


    I'm in Maryland...we use crab claws, not pasta

    fortunately, I prefer pasta to crabs

  4. #4
    JBrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,780
    Quote Originally Posted by DarkroomExperimente View Post
    interesting...but the f-stop calculation doesn't seem to work on a known lens I tested -- is this only for a certain type of lens?


    I'm in Maryland...we use crab claws, not pasta

    fortunately, I prefer pasta to crabs
    It's a fundamental equation. Variables would be the actual location of the nodal point of the lens, the actual diameter used, and infinity focus. If you miss the nodal point, your focal length value will be off by that amount. If you focus on something too close, the focal length measured will be greater than the actual focal length of the lens. The longer the lens is, the more likely this is to be the case. If you measure larger than the diameter of the effective objective, like the barrel diameter, this would also skew the result.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Washington DC area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    596
    "actual diameter used"....perhaps that's the issue

    I used my Konica lens...so the only measurement I didn't read off the lens was the diameter of the element

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Westminster, Maryland, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,504
    Did you get the coal for Christmas?

    Grin.

    I sent this link to all my photo students. Thanks.
    When I grow up, I want to be a photographer.

    http://www.walterpcalahan.com/Photography/index.html

  7. #7
    Kevin Caulfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,097
    Blog Entries
    5
    Images
    52
    That is brilliant, John, I mean Jay. You really are John Belushi reincarnated, aren't you?

  8. #8
    copake_ham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NYC or Copake or Tucson
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    4,092
    Images
    56
    While there's a madness to his method - there's a method to his madness!

    Meanwhile, I'd like to figure out his fetish with cheese. Cheetoz and (presumably) cheese tortelini figure prominently in this latest installment.

    Quite odd.

    "Paging Dr. Freud, paging Dr. Freud - attend STAT - misplaced Wisconsin cheesehead is found in Utah!"

  9. #9
    Kerik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    California
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,465
    Images
    238
    Nice job! You're a funny guy.
    Kerik Kouklis
    Platinum/Gum/Collodion
    www.kerik.com
    2014 Workshop Schedule Online

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Shooter
    Plastic Cameras
    Posts
    1,028
    Quote Originally Posted by DarkroomExperimente View Post
    "actual diameter used"....perhaps that's the issue

    I used my Konica lens...so the only measurement I didn't read off the lens was the diameter of the element
    Its only a very approximate measure because it ignores pupil magnification. The actual aperture is the size of the entrance pupil which you can't see as it's hanging in space inside the lens. Its not the physical size of the iris.
    Last edited by rob champagne; 01-17-2008 at 02:26 AM. Click to view previous post history.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin