Discussions: 45,158 | Messages: 608,954 | Members: 29,918 | Online: 353 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1105 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
635 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
952 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > Miscellaneous > Recommendation for tripod and head

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-29-2008, 05:06 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 44
Default Recommendation for tripod and head

I have a Manfrotto 725b digi which I quite like. However, the tripod head isn't strong enough for my current equipment. I use the tripod primarily for my hasselblad and (don't kill me) Canon 5D w/ grip and some longer lenses. The head obviously isn't built for such a heavy camera, and it slips which is annoying.

What I want is a tripod with a head strong enough for these cameras, but doesn't weigh a ton! I'd also like a built in level (something with the manfrotto lacks). Any recommendations?
dfoo is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-29-2008, 05:28 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 829
Default

A friend of mine has a Berlebach Report tripod that works really well. In due time I will buy one for myself.

Take a look at http://www.berlebach.de/
Uhner is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-29-2008, 09:44 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: France
Posts: 188
Default

I have a Berlebach report (8023 I think) for my LF Camera, which is absolutely fine (but the camera isn't that heavy as it is a Tachihara).

In 35 mm, I successfully use a Manfrotto 055 with 141 RC head. It's not exactly light, has no nuilt-in level, but is really up to the job with my EOS-3 + BPE2 + Sigma 300 mm.
__________________
Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast (Oscar Wilde)
Laurent is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-29-2008, 09:51 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 155
Default

I asked a similar question not too long ago. Here's the thread:

http://www.apug.org/forums/forum44/4...ation-4x5.html
Fotoguy20d is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-29-2008, 10:14 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
Anupam Basu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 492
Default

Look at the Feisol tripods and Markins heads if those are within your budget. You could get a setup under 1.5 kgs that can comfortably hold your gear.
__________________
My Website and Gallery
Anupam Basu is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 05-29-2008, 10:30 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dedham, Ma, USA
Posts: 466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dfoo View Post

....What I want is a tripod with a head strong enough for these cameras, but doesn't weigh a ton! I'd also like a built in level (something with the manfrotto lacks). Any recommendations?
Acratech ball heads are rated for 25 lb loads and weight about 1 lb - that's hard to beat. I recommend one w/rubberized knobs. I have one that can hold my RB with any lens, focusing rails or whatever, in any position. (no built in level).
__________________
"Pictures are not incidental frills to a text; they are essences of our distinctive way of knowing." S. J. Gould
panastasia is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-30-2008, 07:37 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
haris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sarajevo
Posts: 1,448
Default

I have Manfrotto 055 nature and 029 head, I use it with Mamiya RB and it is more than enough for the job. I think it can hold even 8x10 camera... It is heavy. For EOS3 I use Slik 500DX pro (weight 2,5 kg), my Manfrotto combo is not for carrying it around
__________________
Bosnia... You don't have to be crazy to live here, but it helps...

No things in life should be left unfinis
haris is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-30-2008, 07:52 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
2F/2F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 947
Default

Bogen 3033 is my favorite "smallish" but "good" tripod. They are not the easiest to find, but I feel that they are worth the search due to the quick action of the simultaneous expansion of the legs from the center column, as opposed to the 3021. I also find them to be wonderfully lightweight considering how well built they are. I wish I had not sold mine. I also wish that the 3050 had the same quick-expanding legs. This is the only thing I do not like about the 3050.

The 3047 head has never caused me to complain or to wish I had something different; ever. They are sturdy, easily found, inexpensive, and can handle many times the weight of the equipment you mentioned. I personally dislike ballheads (and think they are crazily overpriced), but I suppose they might be useful to some.

I would buy used. I would never buy a new tripod. They lose so much value once originally purchased that it is disgusting...but good for buyers. Very little ever goes wrong with them as well; the good ones, anyhow.
__________________
2F/2F
2F/2F is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using