Discussions: 45,025 | Messages: 607,023 | Members: 29,746 | Online: 451 | Chatroom: 4
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar

Jim Fz

by Gustavo_Castilla
Enter the Gallery
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
876 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
399 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
821 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > Miscellaneous > can someone tell me what is going on ?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-27-2008, 11:28 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
jnanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,283
Blog Entries: 2
Default black and white is color, can someone tell me what is going on ?

hi there ...

last night i processed some film
tri x , plus x and foma 100 and a hand full of 4x5 ...

everything looked ok when i processed it
and i used my usual developer
eyeballed-coffee+soda+vitimin c + a healthy dump of
straight ansco 130 ...

i was very surprised when i scannned proofed plus x film.
i always scan in color and i invert / adjust the levels
a tiny bit. something didn't look right, so i just auto leveled
(something i never do ) to see what the machine guessed i wanted.

and to my surprise they came out in color.

does anyone know what happened to my film ?
i have to look at some of the other strips
i was eager to see what my tri color experiments looked like
so i grabbed 1 strip ... now i have to look at the rest! because
the frames i DID NOT use filters on look like i shot them with
expired provia

the sandles in the gallery was the first one i noticed was in color.
the one i have attached is green leaves and trees behind our house.

thanks!

john
__________________
website

Last edited by jnanian; 11-08-2008 at 04:34 PM.
jnanian is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 06-27-2008, 01:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Valley Stream, NY
Posts: 1,276
Default

You obviously didn't get a color image from the film. What other conclusion can be made other than the scanner is introducing unwanted artifacts?
__________________
Frank Schifano
fschifano is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 06-27-2008, 01:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dedham, Ma, USA
Posts: 465
Default

John,
How do the negatives look?
__________________
"Pictures are not incidental frills to a text; they are essences of our distinctive way of knowing." S. J. Gould
panastasia is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 06-27-2008, 02:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
jnanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,283
Blog Entries: 2
Default

the negatives are contrasty + stained negatives ...
( like they usually look ) ...

john
__________________
website
jnanian is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 06-27-2008, 02:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dedham, Ma, USA
Posts: 465
Default

You discovered a new art form.
__________________
"Pictures are not incidental frills to a text; they are essences of our distinctive way of knowing." S. J. Gould
panastasia is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 06-27-2008, 02:23 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 449
Default

From what I understand caffenol/folgernol negatives are stained brown-ish - my guess is your software saw brown (as opposed to greyscale) and assumed it was in colour and tried to compensate accordingly.

I have had similar issues occasionally with files scanned from green-tinted XP2 or Chinese B&W C-41 film - the software assumes it is in colour because it's green, and sometimes odd tints/compensation can result until a B&W/greyscale conversion happens.
__________________
Semper ubi sub ubi.
mabman is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 06-27-2008, 02:28 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 268
Default

I have the answer:- Buy an enlarger

Regards Paul.
Paul. is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 06-27-2008, 11:30 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Valley Stream, NY
Posts: 1,276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul. View Post
I have the answer:- Buy an enlarger

Regards Paul.

Now that's the best answer! There is nothing quite like the feeling one gets with a well done wet print.
__________________
Frank Schifano
fschifano is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 06-28-2008, 12:41 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Montréal (QC)
Posts: 3,629
Default

Maybe you got an accidental duotone, the equivalent of split-toning on a negative? It looks like your highlights and your shadows are not of the same colors, like a split-toned print.
__________________
Using film since before it was hip.
Michel Hardy-Vallée is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 06-28-2008, 12:42 AM   #10 (permalink)
 
jnanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,283
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul. View Post
I have the answer:- Buy an enlarger

Regards Paul.
i've got 3 of'em
just make proofs before i spend time in the dark
__________________
website
jnanian is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using