Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 74,002   Posts: 1,633,493   Online: 767
      
Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 87
  1. #41
    david b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    None of your business
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,031
    Images
    30
    My latest purchase arrived today. My wife okay'd it.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails my905.jpg  

  2. #42
    rhmimac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    246
    Images
    25

    F6 !

    Quote Originally Posted by nsouto View Post
    Spent 1500 on a F6 two months ago.
    And I don't regret it one bit! Worth every cent of the price.
    I would spend it on a F6 if O could affort it...

    Buying 2nd hand Nikons F65,etc and glass doesn't brake the bank that much:rolleyes:

    R

  3. #43
    Bubbaspunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    The great white/muddy brown north.
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5
    This spring I spent about $1000 Canadian on an old Hassie system, and about $50 on a much newer Minolta.
    So, spend as little as possible but not more than its worth. Or you think its worth.

  4. #44

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Vancouver. WA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    161
    That's tough to answer as there are all the factors... how much you have available, the state of prices (new or used) and the format you want, how you will use it, not to mention how influenced you are by branding. I have gotten good bargains and some klinkers, but at all times... I wanted it and saw myself using it. Otherwise you're a collector.

  5. #45

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    353
    Depends on what it is. Recently $300 on a good working Nikon F4s, $1400 on a gorgeousTachihara 4x5 with three lenses an aluminium case and 20 odd film holders, and $75 for a functional Speed Graphic and Heiland flash attachment. All for using not for looking at. Most ever - $2,100 for my first F5 body back in 1998.

  6. #46
    Ken N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Creston and Newton, Iowa.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    382
    Images
    8

    Budget

    I'm able to budget up to $1200 USD per year on camera purchases for my photography business. I can either buy a new fancy digital body every two years, or a lesser digital every year, or stretch as lesser digital three years and get whatever I want the other two years.

    As film is getting back to being an important part of my business, I can justify spending whatever I need to on this technology. As I really haven't invested additional monies in film gear since 1993, if I got something, I'd have to sell something to get it. My kit got very very refined through the years with very little dross.

    Through the generosity of others, I've been actually acquiring some pretty high-end stuff for little to no money. However, I know that I'm going to spend a chunk of change on some fancy flashgear and motordrives before the next shooting season opens.

    As I budget/balance everything and it has to earn its keep, professionally, I do calculate the cost of digital gear and the cost-savings by being able to skip a year or two in replacement/upgrade cycles is able to fund the purchase of some nice film gear. But I do try to keep things interchangeable with digital as much as possible so there is little to no duplication.

    As to the cost of film and processing? I typically pass those costs onto the client anyway, so there is little cost advantage to me to shoot digital.

    Yet, for professional photographers (both fulltime and parttime), it really is hard going to shoot film anymore. And one must be VERY patient when getting film-technology items because as long as you are not in a hurry to acquire, you can get stuff cheep or free.
    http://www.zone-10.com

    When you turn your camera on, does it return the favor?

  7. #47
    Markok765's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,270
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    24
    Spend $275 on a F5 a few months ago!
    Marko Kovacevic
    Blog
    Youtube

  8. #48
    Martin Aislabie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Stratford-upon-Avon, England
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,413

    Confused

    I have spent over 8000 UK Pounds over the last 18 months getting into LF and am still going, although at a slower rate now I have most of the stuff I need and want.

    I could have done it for less - a lot less - but as an amateur with a hobby I don’t have to do the value for money business thing.

    I plan on using this stuff for the next 25 years – so cost per year is pretty low.

    Most of the stuff I bought new and only a few choice pieces second hand

    I don’t always understand you guys:-

    • On one hand you are all for bragging about how you picked up item X for almost nothing second hand

    • And on the other you are bemoaning the fact that manufacturers are getting out of film and film cameras

    If we want to have a viable film and film camera industry in the future then the choice is in our hands.

    We either buy brand new stuff and support the manufacturers or we don’t and they either go to the wall or go somewhere else.

    It’s our choice.

    But we cannot have it both ways




    Martin

  9. #49

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,696
    Images
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken N View Post
    Yet, for professional photographers (both fulltime and parttime), it really is hard going to shoot film anymore. And one must be VERY patient when getting film-technology items because as long as you are not in a hurry to acquire, you can get stuff cheep or free.
    Yes, so sadly true. I won't invest in any film cameras for active shooting (save for collecting a couple i.e. Olympus OM 4, Canon T90) as E6 is becoming tedious and drawn out to process, with the turnaround now 4 to 5 days locally (1 hour in pro labs, but add $20.00 fuel, 2.5 hours return travel and a heap of traffic hassles). Even C-41 processing is now a tenth of what it was locally than 4 years ago. I am not weakening in my resolve to continue shooting Velvia for as long as I desire, I just do not like the idea that film should be summarily shoved aside for the stormtrooping 'God' that is digital, with its many inherent faults and failings. Where are we going?

  10. #50

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,696
    Images
    15
    Martin, you said:

    "• And on the other you are bemoaning the fact that manufacturers are getting out of film and film cameras"

    That's exactly what they (manufacturers) are doing, but at the moment, it appears confined to 35mm i.e. digi SLRs. Sure you can buy really good used or mint (boxed, new) film cameras but the lack of any new models and stagnation of the market has me thinking that manufacturer's will sooner or later pull the plug on film bodies. It's an unpleasant, ugly thought, I know. I do not know what sort of inroads digital is making into MF or LF, but I suspect it's not at the same ridiculous pace as 35mm. The bigger problem is that the market is being driven by a rampant consumerist, "me too" society that is computer centric and time-sensitive.

    I think anybody planning on using film-based equipment for the next quarter of a century is overly optimistic. Good luck.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin