Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,328   Posts: 1,537,065   Online: 1060
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Krzys's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    506
    Images
    11

    Rear element scratch

    I keep hearing that a rear element scratch is much more horrific than a front element scratch. This sounds logical but does anybody have any first hand accounts about rear element scratches that they could share?

    From what I can find front element damage usually results in flare and loss of contrast/sharpness, if any impact at all. Rear element problems seem to get very vague. 50/50 opinions on running for your life or using it with no noticeable effect.

  2. #2
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    8,592
    Images
    122
    You could probably use it and not notice anything. Just to be safe, an old trick is to fill the scratch with something opaque like Indian ink so it doesn't pass any light.


    Steve.
    "People who say things won't work are a dime a dozen. People who figure out how to make things work are worth a fortune" - Dave Rat.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    142
    I have a lens on which there is a scratch on the rear element. The scratch seems not that deep and probably affect only the coating. I did extensive testing to see if the picture quality was affected and I've not been able to see any degradation of the image.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Woking, Surrey, UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    475
    Images
    27
    I've got an example of the legendary Nikkor 105mm f/2.5 with a cluster of marks/scratches on the rear element. I set one of my Nikon bodies up on a good tripod and took shots with the 105mm and my Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8 (itself a stunningly good performer, and this example in excellent condition with no marks or dirt on any element), zoom set so the viewfinder contents were the same as with the 105mm.

    Results, even of a detailed scene, were indistinguishable to my eye between the two lenses. Using a D70 body and viewing on the computer at 100% showed a very slight edge in sharpness and contrast in favour of the scratched 105mm.

    Don't worry about it!

  5. #5
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    8,592
    Images
    122
    You can get away with quite a lot. On another forum, someone posted an image and asked if anyone thought anything was wrong with it. A bit further down, he posted a picture of the front of the lens he took it with.... together with the smashed polarising filter which was fitted at the time.

    There were no signs of anything wrong in the actual image.

    Therefore, a few scratches or even air bubbles are not going to have much of an effect.


    Steve.
    "People who say things won't work are a dime a dozen. People who figure out how to make things work are worth a fortune" - Dave Rat.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    Rear element scratches tend to cast a shadow on the film.
    Front element scratches do not.

    Front elements scratches can be a nuissance because the edges reflect light. Which is why filling them in with helps.

    The edges of rear elements scratches could reflect light too, but filling them in does not help with the shadow problem.

  7. #7
    André E.C.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Finland
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,520
    Images
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Q.G. View Post
    Rear element scratches tend to cast a shadow on the film.
    Front element scratches do not.

    Ditto!

    Rear element scratches are nasty and not welcome on your optics at all.

  8. #8
    Krzys's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    506
    Images
    11
    Logical, but just more rumors to me. Do you have any examples or first hand accounts of this problem?

  9. #9
    André E.C.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Finland
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,520
    Images
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Krzys View Post
    Logical, but just more rumors to me. Do you have any examples or first hand accounts of this problem?

    If it is that logical, why do you need examples?:o
    Do you have an old optic? Scratch it, test and see for yourself, as for examples, no I don't have, I do take care of my optics!

  10. #10
    Krzys's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    506
    Images
    11
    Because I am interested in seeing pictures or tests showing the ill effects or at least stories detailing them. There are some front element damage tests floating around, but no rear element.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin