NO, NO, NO, NO NO NO NO!!! WRONG!

[EASmithV]

http://www.shotaddict.com/wordpress/...6/08/3643.html

[johnnywalker]

Good Grief, even a non-photographer would recognize the error here (providing they're over the age of 14).

[hoffy]

That's actually quite funny. Was that written by Eastmans Great Grandchildren or something?

[Ian Grant]

Perhaps the writer should learn to read before writing

Then look up the word "antique" Followed by a visit to "The Impossible Project" website.

Ian

[Jesper]

If you already know the truth, why bother with checking the facts?

[Michael W]

Looks like some kind of auto written site, with lots of commercial links. Probably just set up to earn affiliate fees.

[Rick A]

The only thing I have to say is, now I know where not to look for info.

Rick

[bdial]

Yet another reason to stick with APUG for photographic info on the web.

[winger]

It also says at the bottom that it's filed under "digital cameras" and was posted in June 2007.

[alexmacphee]

Clearly someone at Kodak in 1970 had the brilliant idea that the market was ready for a new antique camera, and came up with the concept of the SX70 instant picture antique camera.

Alas, Kodak has lost its way since those heady days, and has forgotten how to make and market antique cameras.

I wish I could afford the Nikon D3X antique camera.