Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,499   Posts: 1,543,150   Online: 1036
      

View Poll Results: What do you do, when in doubt?

Voters
57. You may not vote on this poll
  • over expose over develop ?

    3 5.26%
  • under expose over develop?

    0 0%
  • under expose under develop?

    0 0%
  • over expose under develop?

    13 22.81%
  • over develop?

    5 8.77%
  • under develop?

    0 0%
  • over expose?

    21 36.84%
  • under expose?

    2 3.51%
  • flash my film?

    0 0%
  • nothing / i'm zone'd out ...

    13 22.81%
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: when in doubt

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    local
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,273
    Blog Entries
    4
    Images
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by KWhitmore View Post
    overexpose and overdevelop...always rather have something than nothing. (by the way I'm nearly always in doubt...keeps me on my toes?) :-))
    i'm with you kate!

    im not in doubt very often but have grown accustom to
    over developed and over exposed film, it is my "normal" exposure these days

    john
    silver magnets, trickle tanks sold
    artwork often times sold for charity
    PM me for details

  2. #22
    Christopher Walrath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Milton, DE, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,980
    Blog Entries
    29
    Images
    19
    I am SELDOM in doubt. I can muddle through anything though. I generally tend towards underexposure to gain slightly more contrast in negative film and print it up a bit.
    Thank you.
    CWalrath
    APUG BLIND PRINT EXCHANGE
    DE Darkroom

    "Wubba, wubba, wubba. Bing, bang, bong. Yuck, yuck, yuck and a fiddle-dee-dee." - The Yeti

  3. #23
    BetterSense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,863
    When in doubt, overexpose and overdevelop. This is what I would do for a photo of important documentary value. There's a reason the old WWII photos are always a nice crispy chalk-and-soot tonality. Expose "enough" and develop generously was probably the method.
    f/22 and be there.

  4. #24
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Humboldt Co.
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    4,647
    Images
    40
    I would over-develop. Which really is not "over" develop, but just developed longer until the film is properly developed. I always develop my negs quite a bit more than "normal" -- sometimes for twice the "normal" amount. They are still not "over-developed", but developed just right so that I get easy to print 8x10 negatives for carbon printing.

    I make mistakes, but someday maybe I'll have an assistant I can blame everything on.

    Edited to add: Looks like what I wrote is gibberish, where is an assistant when one needs one?!
    At least with LF landscape, a bad day of photography can still be a good day of exercise.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,322
    Ideally, I'd chose overexposure and underdevelopment, but being a 135 user, that's not always possible. Therefore, I voted overexpose. A bit more exposure with normal development won't really hurt, but overdevelopment is too bad IMHO.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    When in doubt about what exactly?

    I wouldn't drive back home again to see if i left the light on in the hall.

  7. #27
    Wade D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Jamul, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    884
    Images
    3
    Use the "Sunny 16" rule which, for me, tends to overexpose then under develop a bit. Most of my ancient meters overexpose as well.

  8. #28
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Central florida,USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,530
    Images
    1
    Apparently, 120 years of photographic research and education have been largely for the birds. The work of Hurter & Driffield, Loyd Jones, H. Condit, C. Nelson, Minor White, Fred Archer, Ansel Adams, Tom James, Richard Zakia, Phil Davis and many more seems to be unknown or ignored by most.

    As long as we are talking about negative silver-gelatin photography, I'll stick to the old axiom:

    When in doubt, overexpose and underdevelop.

    It has served me well.
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  9. #29
    eddym's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,927
    Images
    26
    When in doubt, I shoot first and ask questions later.
    Eddy McDonald
    www.fotoartes.com
    Eschew defenestration!

  10. #30
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,264
    Images
    148

    2 more options

    Quote Originally Posted by jnanian View Post
    ian
    i wanted more options but 10 was the limit!
    guestimate was one of my original choices
    as well as " hey, i ordered a sandwich " but
    i had to prune the tree
    john
    Two options that are and always have been common where exposures have had to be estimated are:

    1. Clip test, either cut a few frames from a roll of film & process as per normal, or if LF process one sheet first.

    2. Develop by inspection.

    In addition you could use a developer like D76/ID-11 or Xtol and use 1+3 dilution, which gives a slight increase in film speed & drops the overall contrast. This is safer than under developing.

    Ian

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin