Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,693   Posts: 1,482,419   Online: 707
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    98

    Who/Which company is your favorite photography website designer?

    Who/Which company is your favorite photography website designer?

  2. #2
    Slixtiesix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    681
    Images
    21
    http://www.ilfordphoto.com/home.asp

    No gimmicks or fancy flash animations, but you can easily find everything you need without too much hassle.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Burnaby, BC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    528
    +1 for Ilford; our friends at Freestyle have a well-designed site as well. In terms of websites selling equipment, I would give a nod to KEH, Adorama and B&H. Easy to navigate and the search functions in each work well when one is just meandering through...

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    605
    B&H for film, KEH for gear. Ilford's site is nicely set up too.
    ME Super

    Shoot more film.
    There are eight ways to put a slide into a projector tray. Seven of them are wrong.

  5. #5
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    11,578
    Images
    59
    I have the funny feeling that most people are missing the word "designer" at the end of the title to this thread .
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    605
    Does it count if someone else comes up with the design on paper and provides me with the graphics and then I implement it with HTML, CSS and Javascript? If so then I nominate... Me!!
    ME Super

    Shoot more film.
    There are eight ways to put a slide into a projector tray. Seven of them are wrong.

  7. #7
    David Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    near Dallas, TX USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,176
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by MattKing View Post
    I have the funny feeling that most people are missing the word "designer" at the end of the title to this thread .
    Oh, good. I thought it was just me.

  8. #8
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,045
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    424
    I'm very interested in the answers to the actual question because I'd like to redesign my site as well, and while I've got the technical chops to implement it, I don't have the graphic design talent to do all the graphics pieces. It's kinda like porn - can't define it (good design) but I know it when I see it.

  9. #9
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    3,921
    I do loathe any and all use of shockwave/flash....I also abhor sites that open a new tab or window every time I click on a link! Awful!

  10. #10
    Patrick Robert James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    217
    Images
    33
    The problem with graphic designers is that they will usually design a website that shows off their skills when what you really need is a website that shows off your photographs. Those are two different things. Less expensive/experienced designers typically want to throw everything at it to show off their skills. I am not a designer, but I have designed websites in the past, some pretty nice ones too (breaks own arm on back) but not for a long time and I think it is about as exciting to do as watching paint dry (I've done that too so I know). I have been lucky to have been around some pretty good designers though over the years and things tend to rub off a little for one with an inquisitive mind.

    If you are looking for a super straight website there are a few options out there that are pretty flexible. Indexibit is one. There are others that run off of Wordpress as well. Some companies have Flash based interfaces but all the websites done on them tend to look (except for colors and fonts) and function exactly the same. I personally think for the purposes of an art photographer who wants to reach the most people a simple HTML website is the best. My own website I think is a good example of a simple one even if it may be a little "vanilla", but the point of it is to show the images without distractions. It should work on any computer or device and fit on nearly any screen. I pared it down over the years to eliminate anything that anyone could find annoying, I think... It is just HTML with frames and tables, Google fonts, and mostly controlled by CSS. It is due for a major update as the newest image on it is 5 years old but I think the design still holds up fine due to the minimalism of it. Anyway, here it is, as simple as it can be-

    http://www.patrickrobertjames.com/



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin