Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,294   Posts: 1,535,487   Online: 1042
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    michael9793's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Fort Myers, Florida, USA
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    2,001
    Images
    111

    Website problems

    I am just getting started with my 8x20 and printing on AZO paper. The problem comes when i want to scan the 8x20 azo prints to the my website or to the APUG site. No scanners cover 20". I have heard that you can scan the print into to parts and stitch the parts of the print together after scanning.

    I know this is a analog group. but I also know many of you work in larger than 8x10 format. Can anyone help me here or if you do not what to cover it on this site you could just e-mail me.

    thank you for your time

    Michael Andersen
    "Capturing an image is only one step of the long chain of events to create a beautiful Photograph” See my updated website: mandersenphotography.com

  2. #2
    Stoo Batchelor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hertfordshire, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,237
    Images
    42
    Hi Michael

    I'm probably not 100% qualified to say this, but your problem is the same as mine in regards to my prints being too large for my scanner. After researching both on APUG and elswhere, I'm afraid that I had to force myself to buy a cheep d**i**l camera. Yes, I know what your thinking and so did I, but apparently it's the done thing!

    I finally made my mind up after reading an article by a photographer called Bob Herbst. (www.bobherbst.com) who photographs all his Platinum prints for his webb site with, in his words, using a d**i**l camera and a very crude lighting set up.

    He went on to say that the camera should be no less than 3.1 mp for webb work and at least 5 to 6 mp for submitting work to galleries. His photographs look very beautiful on his webb site and certainly made my mind up for me to do the same.

    I hope this helps and I think you will find that there are many more APUGers doing the same.

    Regards

    Stoo Batchelor

  3. #3
    Bob F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,984
    Images
    19
    In your case it should be relatively easy to stitch separate scans together as at least one dimension of your prints (8") will fit the scanner

    The main thing is to stop the scanning software from applying its own brightness and contrast etc adjustments to the scan, because if it does, each scan will have different levels and will obviously not stitch together without that fact showing at the joins. How you do that depends on the scanning software.

    Tape a couple of strips of card to the scanner window to guide the print edges as you shift the print along so when you come to stitch the scans together, the edges are parallel. Make sure each scan includes an inch or so of the previous scan to allow an overlap.

    The tricky bit comes in the actual stitching... I just use a paint program (Paintshop Pro in my case - I find it easier for this job than Ye Olde Photoshoppe). I load the first scan in and then expand the "canvas" (or "background") of that scan as large as the final composite image needs to be (in your case, you will need to make the canvas wider). I then add the other scans one at a time as transparent selections and move them into position by eye using the mouse (zoom in on a part of the image where you can see the two match up correctly). I believe there are programs that make stitching simpler but have not tried any as it's only a very occasional need for me - you might want to try some if it is going to be a common task for you.

    Good luck, Bob.

  4. #4
    Sean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Zealand
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,555
    Blog Entries
    7
    Images
    15
    Another option is to outsource the scans to a shop. I'm not sure how much they would charge but if you only want resolution for web it might be reasonable.

  5. #5
    michael9793's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Fort Myers, Florida, USA
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    2,001
    Images
    111
    Thanks alot guys for the information. It's forums like this where when in need help its just right around the corner.

    Regards
    Michael Andersen
    "Capturing an image is only one step of the long chain of events to create a beautiful Photograph” See my updated website: mandersenphotography.com

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Southern NJ
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    325
    Images
    12
    Michael,

    I've had the same problem with my 8x20 work. I have tried stitching the scans together. But even keeping the same settings for both scans I've had trouble matching the tone as you rotate the negative in the scanner.

    I've experimented with a copy stand and d*g*** camera. the results have been better then the stitching scans, but still not really what I'm looking for. That's why I only have a few of my 8x20 images on my site.

    Hopefully this month I'll get a chance to try one of the cameras from work in the copy stand. Maybe that will do a better job then the little digi I have.

    The other thing I want to try is using a light table to shoot a proof of the 8x20 negative. I've been scan-proofing my 8x10 and smaller negatives for a number of years now. I'd like to do the same with the 8x20.
    George Losse
    www.georgelosse.com



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin