Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,970   Posts: 1,523,504   Online: 828
      
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,000
    Quote Originally Posted by newtorf View Post
    Now I can pack a lot of films in my luggage.
    Yer joking, right?

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    15,943
    Quote Originally Posted by newtorf View Post
    This is assuring coz I will be travelling to China in November and was worried about X-ray. Now I can pack a lot of films in my luggage.
    i wouldn't do that ...
    bring everything carry on
    to be honest, i kind of freaked when
    i realized i luggaged my film, and i wouldn't ever do it again ...
    ask me how ..

  3. #13
    artonpaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    325
    Images
    135
    I've been advised not put film in checked luggage. I've had no problems with carry on, but one of my students said she checked her film and it was fogged with a wild zigzag pattern that looked like a laser hit it. it was color, processed at a lab, and I suspect the film processor, but we'll never know.

  4. #14
    JBrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,780
    Cargo and luggage scanners are very powerful and will wreck film. I know this from painful personal experience. Carry on scanners in first world counties won't. I know this from paranoid personal experience, as in I could detect no b+f increase, after no less than six scans on film 100-1600 iso. Now you could insist that the carry on scanner does something, and I couldn't argue that, but I couldn't find it with my densitometer, and I'm pretty anal about negs.

  5. #15
    JBrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,780
    Quote Originally Posted by artonpaper View Post
    I've been advised not put film in checked luggage. I've had no problems with carry on, but one of my students said she checked her film and it was fogged with a wild zigzag pattern that looked like a laser hit it. it was color, processed at a lab, and I suspect the film processor, but we'll never know.
    A sine or zigzag pattern is typical of X-ray damage.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Southern USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,769
    I beieve that the warning against metal objects concerrns the fact that such objects can leave a shadow. A shadow can be more troblesome than an overall amount of fog.

    Remember that X-ray damage is cumulative. While a single exposure may not cause any noticeable fog, several exposures may cause trouble. It may better to buy film on location rather than bring it with you. You half the cumulative exposure this way.
    A rock pile ceases to be a rock pile the moment a single man contemplates it, bearing within him the image of a cathedral.

    ~Antoine de Saint-Exupery

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Outside Boston, MA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    176
    The last time I flew out of Boston Logan (April 2012), there was a small sign (which I almost didn't read) warning that the X-ray scanners at *this* checkpoint (sadly, I can't remember which terminal) *were* powerful enough to fog film, and that NO film should be sent through them. I asked for and received a hand inspection of the four rolls I had in a zip-lock. Mailed the exposed rolls home from Key West.

  8. #18
    Ambar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    104
    I'm about to travel to the US and buy some film, chemistry and paper to bring over to Brazil. I always get worried about these things because it's my 6-months-worth of photography stash.
    Haven't had a problem with any yet film yet, but I started to worry about paper. I understand the sensitivity of paper is far below that of film but then again it is a lot harder to carry paper as a carry-on item (anything 11x14 or bigger really won't fit a typical carry-on with out potentially damaging the paper inside).
    Should I worry about sending it through checked luggage? Also, in a airport related question, has anybody had any problem checking luggage (not carry-on) with sealed B&W chemistry inside?

  9. #19
    polyglot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,119
    Images
    12
    I did a lap of half the globe that involved 14 xrayings (carry-on) of my film, including once to get into Tiananmen Square. No effect whatsoever.

    Reportedly the checked luggage scanners are higher power and I deliberately left a blank roll of Ektar in my checked luggage for a couple of flights to test that. No effect there either, but it was only Guangzhou-Melbourne-Adelaide and the both Melbourne and Guangzhou have very modern facilities and therefore probably low-power imaging scanners.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Tyler, Texas USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    101
    Images
    20
    I just returned from a 2 week trip to London, Paris, and Rome. The only place I was denied a hand check for film was at St Pancras Train station in London for the Eurostar to Paris. On the other hand the airports all nicely agreed to hand check the film in my carry on bag; DFW, Paris-De Gaulle, Rome-Fiumicino, and Chicago-Ohare.

    I had all the 120 rolls unboxed and in ziplock bags....

    Kent

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin