Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,492   Posts: 1,571,366   Online: 971
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    baachitraka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Bremen, Germany.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,556

    f/stop printing and 0/00 filters for burning.

    After establishing the base exposure to 25.4 sec, I found nothing on the paper for highlights. Aparently I start to burn for 9.9 sec with all those gymnastics.

    My question is can I use 0/00 filter to print highlights without all those gymnastics. Will it work? Its not split-grade, I just curious about using 0/00 filter to get highlights on the paper...
    OM-1n: Do I need to own a Leica?
    Rolleicord Va: Humble.
    Holga 120GFN: Amazingly simple yet it produces outstanding negatives to print.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bookham Surrey
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    107
    Images
    4
    Burning in the highlights at grade 0/00 should get some tone in the area but it may be a bit flat without the sparkle. One tip by Les McLean is to burn in highlights with grade 5; if there is any hint of detail in there then the grade 5 filter will bring it out. Its worth a try.

    Tony

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Live Free or Die
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,516
    Images
    90
    In general, unless the highlights of the neg you are working with are very dense, your base exposure should get you the highlight detail you want. You control the shadow rendition with changes in contrast.
    What filter are you using for the base exposure?
    All that said, you can burn with whatever filtration does the trick, which is one of the nice things about VC papers.
    If the highlights are too dense in the neg, you may want to consider flashing the paper to get some tone into the highlights instead of complicated burning.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    7,111
    If the neg in question is an exception and you can normally print highlights without burning-in or at least get something on the paper then that's fine. However if highlights are always a big problem then it might be worth looking at your development times. Unprintable highlights at exposures that print lower zones OK suggests over-development.

    Try progressively reducing development times for your films by say 10% if development times are less than 10 mins and maybe 15% if times are much over 10 mins to see if this makes a difference. Then if it's not enough and it may not be enough reduce by another 10%

    Worth a try. A 10% reduction should show some difference and isn't going to result in a disaster of thin negs

    pentaxuser

  5. #5
    andrew.roos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    465
    Images
    12
    It sounds as though you are suggesting using a very soft (0/00) grade instead of burning in order to retain highlights. The problem is that this will reduce local contrast throughout the print, making it flatter and with less snap. The advantage of burning is that it allows you to reduce global contrast, by burning the lighter areas, without affecting local contrast.

  6. #6
    baachitraka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Bremen, Germany.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,556
    Scene: St. Mark's Square. The side wall was in a shadow and part of the tower was lit by evening sun and dispersed clouds.

    Paper: MCP 312.

    Developer: Adox Adotol NE.

    Negative: I see the dispersed clouds(very dense), developed using Rodinal 1+50(15mins with 3 inversions @every 5mins) and was using Yellow-Green filter.

    Grade 3: Shadowed wall was rather beautiful but with no highlights at all.

    Grade 2: Shadowed wall was soft but there is an hint of highlight.

    Since, I could not able to decide during printing session so waited till the prints get dry.

    During next session, I thinking to go with Grade 2 and test with 1/3 and 2/3 more stop to overall print.

    Nevertheless, f/stop printing is more fun.
    Last edited by baachitraka; 10-22-2012 at 07:06 AM. Click to view previous post history.
    OM-1n: Do I need to own a Leica?
    Rolleicord Va: Humble.
    Holga 120GFN: Amazingly simple yet it produces outstanding negatives to print.

  7. #7
    baachitraka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Bremen, Germany.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,556
    Quote Originally Posted by andrew.roos View Post
    It sounds as though you are suggesting using a very soft (0/00) grade instead of burning in order to retain highlights. The problem is that this will reduce local contrast throughout the print, making it flatter and with less snap. The advantage of burning is that it allows you to reduce global contrast, by burning the lighter areas, without affecting local contrast.
    I was only thinking to use 0/00 after base exposure was made either with a filter or no filter.

    Base exposure: With or without filter which results in no highlights.
    +
    Expose with 0/00 only, after the base exposure.
    OM-1n: Do I need to own a Leica?
    Rolleicord Va: Humble.
    Holga 120GFN: Amazingly simple yet it produces outstanding negatives to print.

  8. #8
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,493
    Images
    299
    Ideally your test strip with f/stop printing will determine your highlights, then you alter your shadow rendition by changing contrast.

    It sounds like you had a very strong contrast situation, and that you have overdeveloped the highilghts. You are on the right track with using compensating development (5min agitation), but your development time for this neg may have to be shorter.

    Instead of using very soft filters, which tend to produce low local contrast in your print, I recommend practicing flashing, which helps preserve local contrast better than using lower contrast filtration.

    The idea of burning in the sky with Grade 5 filtration is also a good one, because it does add some texture to the print, if there is tonal variation in the highlights of the negative.
    Last edited by Thomas Bertilsson; 10-22-2012 at 09:07 AM. Click to view previous post history.
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh

  9. #9
    Rafal Lukawiecki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Co. Wicklow, Ireland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    737
    Just watch out for any excessive grain that may suddenly appear in otherwise smooth areas, such as the sky or clouds, when burning in with harder grades. While burning in with various grades is very useful, I feel that if you can burn it with the grade of the base exposure, it can make the print less complicated: both to make, and to appreciate.
    Rafal Lukawiecki
    See rafal.net | Read rafal.net/articles

  10. #10
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,350
    Quote Originally Posted by baachitraka View Post
    After establishing the base exposure to 25.4 sec, I found nothing on the paper for highlights. Aparently I start to burn for 9.9 sec with all those gymnastics.

    My question is can I use 0/00 filter to print highlights without all those gymnastics. Will it work? Its not split-grade, I just curious about using 0/00 filter to get highlights on the paper...
    Yes you can use that 0/00 filter. You can also just use 'white' light for the burn, only the green part of the white light has a real effect on the highlights. The high contrast filter that blocks blue light (#5) will have little effect on the dense portion of highlights.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin