Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,295   Posts: 1,535,627   Online: 1089
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    John Bartley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    13 Critchley Avenue, PO Box 36, Monteith Ont, P0K1P0
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,397

    deleted

    ===
    .
    deleted - I have no wish to start anything other than constructive threads
    .
    ===
    Last edited by John Bartley; 02-10-2005 at 11:17 AM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: Thread is non-productive

  2. #2
    geraldatwork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Hicksville, NY
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    414
    Images
    24
    Since any posting to an internet gallery must be done digitally I feel there is nothing wrong with doing whatever possible to make the posted image look as close to the original as possible. Now if for example the original analog print is flat (lacking contrast) IMO it is wrong to digitally improve the contrast and represent that is the way the original print looks.

    OTOH if a print is flat and you represent it as close to the original as possible and say "I think it needs more contrast" and post another version stating clearly that you digitally enhanced it to see if the higher contrast looks better for opinions IMO I think that is fine. I think some of us are here to learn and become better photographers and printers. Others may disagree.
    "When elephants fight it is the grass that suffers"
    African proverb

    IRAQNAM is Bush's legacy

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,236
    Images
    9
    Here we go again. :rolleyes:
    Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI

    So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004

  4. #4
    John Bartley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    13 Critchley Avenue, PO Box 36, Monteith Ont, P0K1P0
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,397
    Quote Originally Posted by mark
    Here we go again. :rolleyes:
    No.. Not at all. I'm asking an honest question about "what procedure" do other gallery posters use - nothing else.
    I have a photo in the critiques gallery, and I don't want to mis-lead anyone so the question was for my benefit and nothing else.
    Please don't read anything else into it and please don't divert this thread into a useless flame war.

    respectfully

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    468
    Scan your image and make it look like the print. End of story... How you got there is up to you and your equipment. No need to fret about such minutia.

    joe

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,236
    Images
    9
    This subject has been covered a lot. I wasn't saying it about your question. I was refering to the comments that inevitably come up. Make the scan look like the print. No one is going to question your work unless something really looks whacked like two different shadow directions or something like a woman with 6 breasts.
    Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI

    So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004

  7. #7
    Bruce Osgood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Brooklyn, N.Y. USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,428
    Images
    45
    With all the hocus-pocus in PS, I have not been able to present a scanned image on a monitor that looks better than the print it is scanned from. So I am not worried about representing an image as "better" than the original. Just ain't gonna happen with my level of equipment. And that's okay. When the day comes that people travel from near and far to see an 'original', they will be pleased.

    So I feel make 'em look as good as you can. They won't be better.

  8. #8
    Jon Shiu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Elk, California
    Shooter
    Plastic Cameras
    Posts
    2,524
    Images
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce (Camclicker)
    With all the hocus-pocus in PS, I have not been able to present a scanned image on a monitor that looks better than the print it is scanned from. So I am not worried about representing an image as "better" than the original. Just ain't gonna happen with my level of equipment. And that's okay. When the day comes that people travel from near and far to see an 'original', they will be pleased.

    So I feel make 'em look as good as you can. They won't be better.
    Since the monitor does literally "glow", it should be easier to attain that quality online that is often elusive in the real print.

  9. #9
    Bruce Osgood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Brooklyn, N.Y. USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,428
    Images
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon
    Since the monitor does literally "glow", it should be easier to attain that quality online that is often elusive in the real print.
    Well, have a look at the APUG galleries, I don't find any "glowing" representations. A few photographers here are outstanding printers and you can see in their work a potential glow.

    Even the AZO & Amidol prints do not represent their glow on a monitor, so anything that helps is good to me. It just isn't going to be better than the print.

  10. #10
    Jon Shiu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Elk, California
    Shooter
    Plastic Cameras
    Posts
    2,524
    Images
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce (Camclicker)
    Well, have a look at the APUG galleries, I don't find any "glowing" representations. A few photographers here are outstanding printers and you can see in their work a potential glow.

    Even the AZO & Amidol prints do not represent their glow on a monitor, so anything that helps is good to me. It just isn't going to be better than the print.
    what about these?
    http://www.volquartz.com/pervolquartz/phot.html

    Jon



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin