Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,472   Posts: 1,570,955   Online: 710
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    136

    Inconsistent Exposure Information

    Recently, I decided to purchase an inexpensive store-bought pinhole camera to get a feel for exposure and processing. The on-line specs for the (Santa Barbara) camera I bought say that the camera has an f/154 and say: "This is a Baltic Birch, 4 x 5" Pinhole Camera, with a focal length equivalent of 50mm, which is a super wide angle lens for this format. Average exposure in bright, noon-day sun is 4 seconds, using 400 ISO film." The exposure time quoted is *much* longer for ISO 400 film than I expected after using a number of exposure calculators for these conditions, which consistently give exposures of 1/4 second or so even with correction for reciprocity failure, minimal, I guess, for such a short exposure. So why would the manufacturer suggest shutter speeds 16 times longer than the charts suggest? What am I missing here? I do realize that I will ultimately have to experiment to get this straight, but it would be great to be in the right ballpark when I start the experimentation. Thanks.

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,431
    Images
    20
    Sounds like a typo. I'd say 1/4-1/2 sec. at ISO 400 should be right. 2-4 sec might be in the ballpark for ISO 100, if it's an old style film with normal reciprocity.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    136
    Thanks for the lightning fast and informative reply. Given the short exposure time, I am concerned about getting the shutter speed right (as I control it by manually opening and closing a flap). I'll purchase Adox 25 to lengthen the shutter speed sufficiently, even in bright sunlight, but I wonder what you think about using ND filters.

  4. #4
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,431
    Images
    20
    If you happen to have fast film and ND filters on hand and can't wait to get some slower film, there's no reason not to use ND filters.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    136
    Thanks again.

  6. #6
    JBrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,784
    Quote Originally Posted by Lobalobo
    Thanks for the lightening fast and informative reply. Given the short exposure time, I am concerned about getting the shutter speed right (as I control it by manually opening and closing a flap). I'll purchase Adox 25 to lengthen the shutter speed sufficiently, even in bright sunlight, but I wonder what you think about using ND filters.
    You could use an ND filter, however at f/154 I'd be hard pressed to guess why you would want to slow it down any further. You would be heading into big reciprocity territory. Also, consider that a pinhole camera has infinite depth of field, so the filter surfaces would be in focus (well sort of, in regard to the focus of the camera), degrading an already soft image.(unless thats part of the effect you seek)

    EDIT -ah, fast film- there's a perfectly good reason- missed that.

  7. #7
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,282
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    Maybe the suggested exposure was to ensure decent exposure in the corners?

    A 50mm "focal length" on 4x5" gives vicious falloff. Almost 3 stops less light in the corners than in the center, which brings a 1/2 second exposure up to 4 seconds. Really more like 3 seconds, but then reciprocity failure steps in...
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    136
    Thanks so much to all. Regarding the ND filter, yes the concern was over fast film and an ability to control a manual shutter pinhole camera. I'll purchase slower film, though, given your advice, and probably not bother with the ND filter for reasons given and otherwise. (Three plus seconds is long enought to make relatively precise adjustments even if just moving a flap by hand.) I expect falloff in the corners and am not too worried about it. My purpose here (at least to begin) is to re-acquaint myself with and teach my daughter about analog photography in the most elemental format I can find, which is a pinhole camera and contact prints. Simple is good, but pure white or pure black negatives wouldn't be much fun, thus my questions about getting a manageable exposure range to experiment with. Thanks again to all.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin