Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,205   Posts: 1,531,770   Online: 955
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Ed Sukach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,520
    Images
    26
    Informative article, Helen ... although I had to read it a couple of times.

    Given the complexities of the light measuring device and its relation to the spectral response of the film, (adding in differences between "T" Stops and f/stops - and ambient light spectra), it is remarkable that most exposures are as close as they are in real life.

    Does anyone wonder why I cringe at the declaration by some that, "I ALWAYS (alternative: "you NEED to") contol your exposures to 1/10th stop"?

    I've worked extensively with Cascade Photomultiplier - based instrumentation, and all I can say to those "1/10th stop" types is, "Good luck - you are going to need LOTS of it."

    Just thought of a similie: "Like trying to measure a spring made of Jell-o with a rubber ruler".
    Carpe erratum!!

    Ed Sukach, FFP.

  2. #12
    CPorter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    West KY
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,662
    Images
    24
    If you get into the ZS method of exposure and development (I assume you do of some sort, maybe this is a bad assumption) and you have determined your personal film speed using the original spot meter, and you have determined your normal development time for the enlarger and paper that you use, should you have the new spot meter adjusted to match the original spot meter to nullify any possible difference, be it 1/3 or whatever. Seems that any variation in the new meter can be reduced to at least match the old one so that your standard EI for the film and its "normal" development time is not adversely affected by any variation in the new meter. I don't know myself, because I have only one meter, the Pentax V, and that's all I use----I'm just asking those more knowledgeable than me.

    Not to overthink it too much, as that risk is always present in such discussions, but this keeps going through my head when it is said that 1/3 stop difference is not to be a concern. I ask myself, why is it on the meter scale then?

    125PX at EI 64 dev for 5min and 15sec (hc-110 dil 1:63 from concentrate) did not produce the proper gray scale values in Zones VII, VIII and IX when I was testing Plus-X, but a further reduction in development time of about 15% to 4min 30sec nailed those zones properly on the scale without adverse affect in the lower zones.

    So, my question is, when it comes to the upper zones of the gray scale, I wonder if a 1/3 stop difference in the direction of increased exposure is a valid concern to one's personal EI and dev time?

    I don't think +1/3 stop is a great concern for a short scale subject, owing to lattitude, but for a "normal" SBR, when "normal" dev is planned, a continuous +1/3 difference could squeeze the upper zones where you don't want them, it would seem. I may someday want to get me a backup spot meter. Yes, I'm a zonie, but that is beside the point , so if someone could provide input to my concern, that would be great.

    Thanks in advance.
    Chuck

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin