Discussions: 45,003 | Messages: 606,762 | Members: 29,738 | Online: 234 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
870 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
395 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
816 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Exposure Discussion > Opening Stops, Lose Depth of Field?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-24-2007, 05:50 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2
Default Opening Stops, Lose Depth of Field?

I'm slowly learning how to use the zone system, and while I understand the point of everything, I always see people telling me to open one or two stops for this or for that...How does one use the zone system method without altering the aperture?

I've just been changing the exposure time accordingly and leaving the aperture where I want it. Are they inter-changeable?

I have a feeling this is a ridiculously silly question, oh well.
superjoe is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 12-24-2007, 05:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
noblebeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 536
Default

You basically have it right: when discussing exposure a 'stop' can be an actual f-stop, or the shutter speed. Example: you meter something for 1/30th at f/22 - if you shoot it at 1/15th you have overexposed by 1 stop.

Joe
__________________
visit: Day of the Dead - the Book

"Don't ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself what makes you come alive and go do that, because what the world needs is people who have come alive" - Howard Thurman
noblebeast is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 12-24-2007, 05:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2
Default

Cool. So with depth of field out of mind...will the exposure change if I raise the shutter speed vs. raising the aperture? Are they exactly inter-changeable or is it kind of an estimate?
superjoe is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 12-24-2007, 06:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
david b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: new mexico
Posts: 3,447
Default

Hey Joe,
the zone system rule of thumb is

"expose for the shadows and develop for the highlights"

So when you point your meter at a shadow, you will need to stop down. The meter measures for zone V. You will probably want your shadows at zone III. To do so, you have to stop down two stops.

The same happens when photographing snow. When you point the meter at snow, it measures it at zone V. In order to make it white, you will have to open up two stops.

You can open up or stop down with either the aperture or the shutter speed. Since I always use a tripod and slow film, I prefer to alter my shutter speed so that I do not affect what is in focus.

Also, have a look at my take on developing film.

Click here.

Good luck. I hope this helps.

Welcome to APUG and Happy Holidays.
__________________
.my blog.
david b is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 12-24-2007, 06:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
bdial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Live Free or Die
Posts: 1,513
Default

Generally speaking, they are interchangeable. Each change in shutter speed, or aperture changes the light reaching the film by 1/2 or *2. You may find it worthwhile to test by making a series of exposures at each shutter speed/ aperture combination. The resulting negatives should show even density with each other. Any that are lighter or darker than the others indicate a fast or slow shutter (most likely).
bdial is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 12-24-2007, 07:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Christopher Walrath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,793
Blog Entries: 1
Default

And also, Joe, just as each successive Shutter speed is either a doubling or a halving of the duration the shutter is open, each successive aperture setting is either a doubling or halving of the geometric AREA of the aperture. So any adjustment made either doubles or halves exposure whether it is an adjustment in shutter speed or in aperture.
__________________
Thank you.
Christopher A. Walrath - Acting Editor
Creative Image Maker Magazine
New December 2008 issue due out 29 Nov 2008
Email me with any questions. Thank you.

Christopher A. Walrath Photography
Massive Dev Chart
Fred Parker's Ultimate Exposure Calculator

"Behold, you are old and your sons do not walk in your ways." I Samuel 8:5
Christopher Walrath is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 12-24-2007, 07:14 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
MattKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Delta, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 2,433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdial View Post
Generally speaking, they are interchangeable. Each change in shutter speed, or aperture changes the light reaching the film by 1/2 or *2. You may find it worthwhile to test by making a series of exposures at each shutter speed/ aperture combination. The resulting negatives should show even density with each other. Any that are lighter or darker than the others indicate a fast or slow shutter (most likely).
Joe:

This is what people are referring to when they talk about "reciprocity".

It applies over a wide range of values, but not universally. People who use telescopes to take photographs of stars have to worry about this (because the light is so dim) but if the light levels are reasonably normal, this works like a charm.

As you begin to get comfortable with this, the creative possibilities reveal themselves (adjusting aperture for depth of field, or shutter speed for motion blur, or lack of it, for instance).

Matt
MattKing is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 12-24-2007, 07:57 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
copake_ham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NYC or Copake or Tucson
Posts: 4,083
Default

Being "old school" I am very comfortable with the f/stop v. shutter speed ratio - and the creative opportunities etc.

But I still keep scratching my head over using "EV"....?
copake_ham is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 12-24-2007, 08:33 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,099
Default

EV is simple - it is an index for a particular exposure value (amount of light, basically). The same creative opportunities exist since once an EV is set, any set of shutter speed and aperture can be chosen... and you'll know that whatever you choose within that EV will yield the same exposure.
BrianShaw is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 12-24-2007, 08:38 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
copake_ham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NYC or Copake or Tucson
Posts: 4,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianShaw View Post
EV is simple - it is an index for a particular exposure value (amount of light, basically). The same creative opportunities exist since once an EV is set, any set of shutter speed and aperture can be chosen... and you'll know that whatever you choose within that EV will yield the same exposure.
Huh?

Thanks, but ...

I thought I was on your Ignore list?
copake_ham is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 AM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using