Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,548   Posts: 1,544,533   Online: 1008
      
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    18

    advancing film without tripping shutter

    In the 80's I saw a photographers work that remains forever fixed in my imagination. I can't remember his name but he shot one image over an entire roll of 35mm (I assume) film. The images were static with one side stretched the length of the whole roll. I believe he shot a cover shot for Jean Michel Jarre's "Zoolook". Does anyone know how this was done (how to modify a camera to do this) and who this guy is/was? Thank you in advance for your help.

  2. #2
    David William White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Hamilton, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,182
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    32
    The 'smear' is so selective on that CD cover that I'm sure this could not be done in camera. I would guess it could be a either a physically manipulated Polaroid, or some other selective panning of the paper during the enlarging phase.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    18
    The cover art is infantile compared to the work that I'm really looking for which spans the entire roll of film (stretched limbs, eyes ect.). I know that the pieces I'm referring to were done directly to the negative because I saw them numbered in sequence without any interruption of the image.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    18
    The artist that shot the cover is not, I think, the same artist that shot the rolls of film I'm talking about but, the effect is roughly the same only more so.

  5. #5
    David William White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Hamilton, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,182
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    32
    Ok, so kind of guessing in the dark here, but how about this:

    Assuming typical manual film SLR:

    Advance film to the end with the lens cap on (so no exposure), then switch shutter to bulb (mirror up, shutter open). Take lens cap off, depress the transport release on the bottom and rewind the film manually. The film will stream back across the open shutter. That would smear the scene across the entire roll.

    Jeez, I think I'll try this sometime!
    Last edited by David William White; 09-17-2009 at 12:51 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    492
    I'm not sure what photo you are talking about, but could it have been taken with a panorama camera? Some of these devices were mounted on a tripod in such a way that the camera was rotated on the tripod synchronously with the movement of the film. The focal plane was screened off except for a very narrow slit. It was kind of like a focal plane shutter, except instead of the slit moving across the film, it was the film moving across the slit.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    343
    Hey,
    As they say, "back in the day," Cokin used to sell a kit for converting your 35mm camera to be used with a slit shutter. The slit was a plastic cap that fit the thin rail at the rear of the cokin holder. Combining objects in motion with still ones (and varying the direction of the motion w/ relation to the direction o fthe films movement) produced effects like you describe.
    Best

    Celac

  8. #8
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,219
    Sounds like a slit shutter camera. There are some examples on this page of a home made slit camera with 120 film: http://www.vintagebus.com/gallery/su...rt-deluxe.html

  9. #9
    bsdunek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,116
    Images
    194
    You may be refering to a 'strip camera', where the film moved to follow the action. Like this: http://www.sportsshooter.com/news/2043
    I remember when Marty Forsher, a well known New York camera repairman (far more than that!) was making these.
    Bruce

    Moma don't take my Kodachrome away!
    Oops, Kodak just did!


    BruceCSdunekPhotography.zenfolio.com



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin