Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,198   Posts: 1,531,444   Online: 782
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Shooter
    Large Format Pan
    Posts
    14

    8x10 Chrome Photography

    I enjoy shooting 8x10 as an amatuer. Lately I've been getting the itch to shoot chrome in 8x10. Other than shooting it just because I'd like to is there a more practical side to shooting chrome in this size. It is quite expensive and I'd like some input from the forum on the matter.

    Thanks

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,280
    Images
    2
    I don't think there is anything practical about shooting 8x10 chromes. Fun and worthwhile maybe, but not practical unless you are wealthy. I bought a single package of 8x10 Velvia years ago and never even used it.

  3. #3
    holmburgers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Rochester NY (native KS)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,418
    Images
    2
    Why would you buy a box of 8x10 Velvia and never use it?

    I like shooting chromes because... well... you can look at it! For me, 4x5" E6 is way preferable to C41 since I'm scanning; so having a chrome is in itself something to look at.

    Do it.
    If you are the big tree, we are the small axe

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    100
    I shot Trannie for years and I must say the quality is about as good as it gets it is also easier to scan and there is less grain, There is a trend to shoot neg for its muted colour range and wider latitude particularly in the fine art market and some find e6 a bit shouty so it could be said that the choice of film is as much about subject as output. I would suggest that so long as your metering is accurate there is a great deal of satisfaction to be had from shooting trannies. On the cost front e6 is a lot less than neg and you do not need a contact to see what you have.

  5. #5
    Palantiri7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    127
    Worth a try at least once, I think. The film is expensive but processing is not if you do it yourself. I can develop 40 sheets with a Tetenal 3 bath kit. The results will be *awe*.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	col25.jpg 
Views:	61 
Size:	189.6 KB 
ID:	30890

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,280
    Images
    2
    sometimes I buy stuff and dont use it. It happens.

  7. #7
    Poisson Du Jour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    SE Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,539
    Images
    15
    With such a big format, you might want to ensure your exposures on chrome are spot on, rather than "near enough" — especially if you intend to print. No slavish airs and graces in terms of latitude as with C41 are afforded with chrome, and this is where exposure errors can make the process much more expensive than originally anticipated.
    .::Gary Rowan Higgins

    A comfort zone is a wonderful place. But nothing ever grows there.
    —Anon.






  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,780
    Quote Originally Posted by Palantiri7 View Post
    Worth a try at least once, I think. The film is expensive but processing is not if you do it yourself. I can develop 40 sheets with a Tetenal 3 bath kit. The results will be *awe*.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	col25.jpg 
Views:	61 
Size:	189.6 KB 
ID:	30890
    I love your picture!

    Jeff



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin