Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,206   Posts: 1,531,862   Online: 949
      
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Results 51 to 59 of 59
  1. #51

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    27
    Ive been working with Ektar for a while now and was continuously getting terrible colour shifts. Initially from shooting at EI. 50 - learnt that mistake pretty quickly However, I still found it difficult to post process without the colour shift problems. I've finally fixed everything...

    I scan with a Nikon scanner and use Vuescan (its great software). I lock the exposure and base then choose an inbuilt film type that gives me the "least" colour cast in preview. In Photoshop Levels, choose Options then test combinations to achieve the most neutral image. The next step is my break through; make all tonal adjustments on the "L" channel in L*a*b mode. Within an RBG colour model, luminosity changes in Ektar has very strong impacts on chrominosity. By separating luminosity out from chrominosity you can make very significant tonal adjustments without those funky colour shifts. Just convert back to RGB when your done. Finally, where ever I see local colour casts with the image I will make a global adjustment manually then just introduce that via the history brush.

    I even used to add some desaturation, especially to skin tones, prior to using L*a*b just to get rid of that strong red shift in Ektar - now no more need

  2. #52
    hpulley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,214
    Images
    75
    Ektar does not like overexposure for sure but it loves to be optically printed onto Fuji CA or Kodak Supra paper which is much simpler sounding than your above hybrid workflow!
    Harry Pulley - Visit the BLIND PRINT EXCHANGE FORUM

    Happiness is...

  3. #53
    Athiril's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,496
    Images
    28
    IMHO VueScan is terrible, not an APUG issue, but it can easily lead to lots of colour problems and clipping, which you could mistake for an analogue issue.

    Optical printing isn't simple.. one has to get an enlarger, chemicals and paper etc. Labs print with laserjets onto crystal archive typically as opposed to directly off the neg. (ie from a scan).

  4. #54
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22,972
    Images
    65
    I've been able to scan my Ektar negs with no changes to my software settings using my Epson scanner. It scans the same as my Portra.

    PE

  5. #55
    Diapositivo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,844
    I use curves and levels on the L channel of the L*a*b model as a standard procedure. Curves used in RGB always produce a colour shift, this can be more or less pronounced, but it's always there to my eyes.

    I also find ColorPerfect by CFSystems a very effective piece of software, even though with the most contorted user interface and user manual I have ever come across.

    One day I'll have my proper darkroom and I will be able to judge results by optical printing. At the moment I cannot judge colours in negatives on their own, it's only the scan I see. Sometimes life is much easier with slides.
    Fabrizio Ruggeri fine art photography site: http://fabrizio-ruggeri.artistwebsites.com
    Stock images at Imagebroker: http://www.imagebroker.com/#/search/ib_fbr

  6. #56
    JS MD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Tampa Bay
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    53
    Re:
    Konica Impresa 50/ 120 had a wrong balance - too much red and too much green .
    This is a wrong balance of Hue . Can be adjusted only in CMYK
    Last edited by JS MD; 06-14-2011 at 02:05 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  7. #57

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5
    In my hands, there were two actions which remarkably improved the colors of Ektar 100:

    1. I tried to avoid underexposure - compare test attached (look for color, neglect differences in brightness)

    2. I used Negfix8 - google for Negfix8 - I cannot post a link here.
    Best, Frank
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Test Ektar 100.jpg  

  8. #58
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22,972
    Images
    65
    Unfortunately, you all scan these to different densities with respect to the given speeds. You should lighten or darken the "off" exposures to match the density of the reference at ISO 100 and then compare them. Then it becomes a valid comparison.

    PE

  9. #59

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5
    Sorry, for the sloppy testing. I tried to better match the densities in the red-marked parts of the pictures. Nevertheless, there are still differences in the densities in the other parts of the pictures, probably in part due to the color shift.
    Best regards, Frank
    Attached Files

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin