Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,958   Posts: 1,523,001   Online: 1199
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Doc W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    139
    Images
    2

    Dumb Question about Incident Meter

    I just got a Lunasix 3 almost accidentally and thought I would give it a go (I invested in the battery conversion thingy and even the guy at B&H where I bought it thought the price was outrageous).

    The meter is physically different from other meters I have used and I am not sure I am holding it right for incident light. Let's use a portrait example. Normally, I would hold the incident meter in front of the subject so that the dome is facing the camera. If I try to do this with the Gossen, I have to hold it horizontal and backwards. This doesn't seem right. It feels like I should hold the meter vertically with the dome facing upwards. But this doesn't seem right either. Also, there is one stop difference between these two methods.

    I can do tests of course, but thought I would solicit some thoughts first from you folks.

  2. #2
    CGW
    CGW is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,798

  3. #3
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,009
    Quote Originally Posted by CGW View Post
    And if you find what you download useful please donate $3 to keep this public service available.

    Steve
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  4. #4
    Doc W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    139
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by CGW View Post
    I have the manual, but I just found that position a little awkward so I thought maybe I was doing something wrong. My previous incident meter was a lot easier to use. I just held it in front of the subject while facing the subject. With the Gossen, I have to turn around and face the camera, or hold the meter horizontal and backwards. I think I may return to the other style of meter (my other one died and the Gossen was handy). I don't really see any advantage to this meter and it is a little awkward, in my opinion.

  5. #5
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,009
    Sometimes the advice given here is worth what you paid for it.
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  6. #6
    artonpaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    325
    Images
    135
    My take on incident readings is as follows: The white dome is a stand-in for the subject. The meter should be held close to the subject, or in such a way that the light falling on the dome replicates the light falling on the subject when the dome is pointed towards the camera lens. In other words, if the subject is lit with side light so that it is half in shadow, the dome should likewise be half in shadow. Always point the top of the dome towards the lens of the camera.

  7. #7
    CGW
    CGW is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,798
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc W View Post
    I have the manual, but I just found that position a little awkward so I thought maybe I was doing something wrong. My previous incident meter was a lot easier to use. I just held it in front of the subject while facing the subject. With the Gossen, I have to turn around and face the camera, or hold the meter horizontal and backwards. I think I may return to the other style of meter (my other one died and the Gossen was handy). I don't really see any advantage to this meter and it is a little awkward, in my opinion.
    Incident measures light falling on the subject, not reflected from it. If you were pointing your "incident" meter at the subject, then you were taking a reflected reading. With the Gossen--and any other incident meter I've used--you point the dome at the camera from the subject's position. It's a bit awkward with the old school Gossens since the dome isn't on the front of the meter.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,939
    Pointing the dome toward the camera is correct. And yes it's kind of awkward because the Lunasix3 design favor reflected light reading. Using one of the other meter in reflected light mode you will see it' awkward unless it has 2 sensors or rotating head.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Downers Grove Illinois
    Posts
    1,050
    Artonpaper is correct. Dome faces camera

  10. #10
    2F/2F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,008
    Images
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc W View Post
    I just got a Lunasix 3 almost accidentally and thought I would give it a go (I invested in the battery conversion thingy and even the guy at B&H where I bought it thought the price was outrageous).

    The meter is physically different from other meters I have used and I am not sure I am holding it right for incident light. Let's use a portrait example. Normally, I would hold the incident meter in front of the subject so that the dome is facing the camera. If I try to do this with the Gossen, I have to hold it horizontal and backwards. This doesn't seem right. It feels like I should hold the meter vertically with the dome facing upwards. But this doesn't seem right either. Also, there is one stop difference between these two methods.

    I can do tests of course, but thought I would solicit some thoughts first from you folks.
    The dome points the way with an incident meter. The dome is in a different position on the body than it is on the Sekonic, so of course you must hold the meter horizontal and backwards with the Gossen. Not only that, but the Sekonic lets you get the meter almost right up to the person's face, while in order to get the Gossen's dome as close, the person must move is or her head out of the way. This can make a difference in meter reading if the lights are close enough.

    As for the meters being different, that happens all the time! First of all, different makers assign middle gray to different amounts of light. For example, 18 percent is the common figure we hear, but I think some meter makers use 14 percent.

    There is also the issue of age and calibration. Have both meters been serviced by a person who really knows light meters?

    The domes' yellowing over time can also block light.
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin