Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,880   Posts: 1,520,492   Online: 817
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    rthomas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,099
    Quote Originally Posted by Denis R View Post
    this lens

    what is the intent of the rule?
    A reflex lens, good idea. The Sony lens is *just* at the edge of the rule. Tamron also had a 350mm f/5.6 SP that is short enough.

    I assume the intent of the rule is to control photographic access, i.e. no "unauthorized" photogs bringing super-telephoto lenses and "stealing" shots that could otherwise only be made from the sidelines. Or something like that.

  2. #12
    polyglot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,080
    Images
    12
    Someone has paid for media rights on the venue and wants to protect that. It sucks but since it's private property, they do have the right to control these things.

  3. #13
    Rudeofus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,547
    Images
    10
    How about a super zoom like this one?

    * ducks and runs for cover *

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin