Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,871   Posts: 1,583,344   Online: 1145
      
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 46
  1. #21
    papagene's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Western Mass., USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,199
    Images
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by Worker 11811 View Post
    ...

    One night, I was in the darkroom after hours and the ceramics teacher came by and said, "Are you still using film?"

    Without missing a beat, I said, "Are you still making pots out of clay?"...

    Great answer!!
    gene LaFord


    Long live Ed "Big Daddy" Roth!!
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    "I don't care about Milwaukee or Chicago." - Yvon LeBlanc

  2. #22
    Maris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Noosa, Queensland, Australia.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    752
    I say a 'phone or digital camera can make pictures but those pictures aren't really photographs, haven't got the same relationship to subject matter as photographs, and don't deliver a photographic quality viewing experience to me. If I want an authentic photograph, not a virtual one, then nothing touched by data-based technology is worth looking at.
    Photography, the word itself, invented and defined by its author Sir John.F.W.Herschel, 14 March 1839 at the Royal Society, Somerset House, London. Quote "...Photography or the application of the Chemical rays of light to the purpose of pictorial representation,..". unquote.

  3. #23
    cliveh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,668
    Images
    344
    The answer I would give is that film has physical integrity. It is not a lot of numbers waiting for arrangement, but a physical capture of the image. In short it has the here, right now, zen existance.
    Last edited by cliveh; 02-11-2012 at 06:37 PM. Click to view previous post history.

    “The contemplation of things as they are, without error or confusion, without substitution or imposture, is in itself a nobler thing than a whole harvest of invention”

    Francis Bacon

  4. #24
    nsurit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Texas Hill Country
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,328
    Images
    18
    I might say something like, "Oh, I have many tools at my disposal and film cameras do some things much better than my cell phone. When I am seriously interested in creating images, my choice is film because of its ability to give me the results I find most pleasing. I also enjoy the processes involved in producing my images with a film camera."

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    16,883
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Maris View Post
    I say a 'phone or digital camera can make pictures but those pictures aren't really photographs, haven't got the same relationship to subject matter as photographs, and don't deliver a photographic quality viewing experience to me. If I want an authentic photograph, not a virtual one, then nothing touched by data-based technology is worth looking at.
    i don't know exactly what you mean ...
    a sensor isn't light sensitive, an image isn't drawn with light ?
    having a cellphone image light jet printed
    through a sophisticated enlarger head
    onto light sensitive paper and souped in chemistry
    at a mini lab isn't drawn with light ?

    its like suggesting slides aren't authentic ...

    i don't think authenticity has much to do with it ...
    it is just a different technology ... one isn't more authentic or photographic than the other ..

  6. #26
    keithwms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,079
    Blog Entries
    20
    Images
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by jnanian View Post
    i don't know exactly what you mean ...
    a sensor isn't light sensitive, an image isn't drawn with light ?
    having a cellphone image light jet printed
    through a sophisticated enlarger head
    onto light sensitive paper and souped in chemistry
    at a mini lab isn't drawn with light ?

    its like suggesting slides aren't authentic ...

    i don't think authenticity has much to do with it ...
    it is just a different technology ... one isn't more authentic or photographic than the other ..
    +1

    This isn't a question of right or wrong, good or evil, etc. It's about using the medium that helps you do what you want to do.
    "Only dead fish follow the stream"

    [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Central Florida, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,071
    I think we get way too caught up in technicality of producing photographs. Photography happens about 6 inches behind the camera (of any kind)....

    Well... 8 inches if you have a big head.
    Develop, stop, fix.... wait.... where's my film?

  8. #28
    dehk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    W Michigan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    888
    Smile and Nod.
    - Derek
    [ Insert meaningless camera listing here ]

  9. #29
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,932
    Images
    60
    I don't think I have had anyone say they thought film was "pointless", but I certainly have had questions from those who are curious.

    My response depends on a number of factors.

    In many cases, the question comes from someone who has used film in the past. For those people, I respond by indicating how much I enjoy using film. In addition, I mention that I still do my own black and white darkroom work, that film and processing is (relatively) readily available in my area, and that modern films are really wonderful in comparison to films from even 25 years ago.

    Also, if someone notices what I am doing, it is fairly likely that I'll be using medium format equipment. Many former film users still recognise the larger medium format equipment as being in some way "special", and therefore it seems to be easier to explain why I use it.

    And for those that have never shot film, I think the combination of the "unusual" equipment I use, my enthusiasm about the subject, and my phrase "I've been using and enjoying film for 40+ years, why should I change now" helps convince them that I have good reasons for the choice.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  10. #30
    jscott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    PNW
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    84
    Tell them that Kodak's film sector increased by 20% last year. And who wouldn't prefer a home cooked meal to McDondalds?

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin