|
|
|
-
Historical Gripe
As someone who is very interested in Historical Photography, can I say how dismayed I was when visiting Lacock Abbey some years ago, to find that in the basement there was a large sign stating that part of Harry Potter was filmed here. William Henry Fox Talbot used this space as his darkroom, but there was no mention of this. What is the world coming to? Can others give examples of similar perplexity?
“The contemplation of things as they are, without error or confusion, without substitution or imposture, is in itself a nobler thing than a whole harvest of invention”
Francis Bacon
-
Surely there is some mention of William Henry Fox Talbot at the site isn't there? That would be crazy if there is no mention.
Not a gripe, but a interest in seeing more documentation - I've been collecting GPS location data for the sites Walker Evans photographed in my area (northern W.Va.) and would like to see some sort of markers. I'm thinking maybe just small disks set into the sidewalk or something of that sort.
-
-
The Fox Talbot museum is just up the road, in the village.
-
 Originally Posted by tomalophicon
Who's Henry Fox Talbot?
I rest my case.
“The contemplation of things as they are, without error or confusion, without substitution or imposture, is in itself a nobler thing than a whole harvest of invention”
Francis Bacon
-
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
-
-
The problem is that as a NT property Laycock Abbey has to appeal to the general public who are mildly interested in the history of photography but very interested in Harry Potter.
pentaxuser
-
Who's Harry Potter? Was it one of them pornographic films?
-
 Originally Posted by Klainmeister
Who's Harry Potter?
Wasn't he the Colonel on M*A*S*H?
-
 Originally Posted by Klainmeister
Who's Harry Potter? Was it one of them pornographic films?
Yep. "Dirty Harry Potter".
|
|