Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 74,082   Posts: 1,635,649   Online: 1095
      
Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 5678910111213 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 123
  1. #101

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    604
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    I started at 1010. In the last few years I added MF and LF. I am 1000010.
    You are 66 and started at age 10. :-)


    I'm 53 and started photography at age 11 with an inexpensive Kodak 126 camera. I think it was a model 124.

  2. #102
    Diapositivo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,844
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    I started at 1010. In the last few years I added MF and LF. I am 1000010.
    Binary arithmetic is off-topic on this site for obvious reasons
    Fabrizio Ruggeri fine art photography site: http://fabrizio-ruggeri.artistwebsites.com
    Stock images at Imagebroker: http://www.imagebroker.com/#/search/ib_fbr

  3. #103

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    604
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    You broke the code.
    It was tough, but I channeled Alan Turing.

  4. #104
    Slixtiesix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    861
    Images
    21
    I´m 25 and my interest in serious photography started when I bought a roll of FP4+ back in the spring of 2002.

  5. #105
    Jim Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rural NW Missouri
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,965
    I'm 79 and started with a folding Kodak in my teens, bought a new Leica at 20, and my first Nikon SLR at 35. I still use 35mm and large format where appropriate, and digital for casual photography.

  6. #106
    darkosaric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,279
    Images
    4
    Excel file updated.
    Attached Files

  7. #107
    Trond's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Harestua, Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    683
    Images
    75
    I'm 40. Started with photography when about 13.

    Trond

  8. #108
    David Lyga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,492
    I think that we all owe heartfelt thanks to darkosaric for taking the time and effort to quantify these results into a succinct, clearly readable, and understandable format with graphic interface.

    Let's face it, it was a whole lot easier to do his abstract with digitization, (ie MS Excel) than doing it manually. That facility kind of solidifies the 'legitimacy' of electronic data gathering, doesn't it? And that reality, whether with words, numbers, or images ends up shooting ourselves in the foot, so to speak. Yes, we all know deep down that digital photography, when distilled into pure logic and theory, is far better than analog: no deterioration of media, no darkroom necessary, no worry about the histogram not being able to be corrected, and, for professionals who shoot at unrepeatable venues, a heaven sent bounty of certainty. Still...

    There really is something about film that makes me feel very secure and safe. I do not know why, specifically, but there is a kind of 'warmth' with actually holding a negative that you can actually see without aid of electronics. Maybe there is more to life than scientific theory or 'mere' pragmatism. I do love the clear, bright sound of classical music on CDs but...something is lost and I cannot quantify what that is. Is it romance for 'what was' (at my age), or are there components not identifiable to mere mortals? I own no CD player but have, in storage, 6000 classical music LPs. Maybe I am just plain nuts. But as I say this there are literally dozens of turntable manufacturers in this world who have not yet gone out of business more that twenty years after 33 rpm vinyl 'died'.

    Likewise, analog photography retains a diehard retinue of adherents. On this survey what came across clearly was the fact that no one here is mentally deficient, naive, culturally deficient, or uninitiated with life itself. Most found this survey at least somewhat rewarding to ponder. Emotionally, there was the impression of satisfaction and healthy support for 'our niche'. And why should it really matter whether or not we are 'correct' with our thinking here? I am not prepared to defend the availability of film and paper with my life (nor are any others here) but I do get the impression that analog capture will continue to be available even on our collective, chronically averaged 'death bed'. And why not? Life is not best when 100% efficient. There have to be 'loose ends' that point the way for new thought processes to be born. Maybe we are more legitimate than even we think. - David Lyga

  9. #109

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Midlands, UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    920
    Average APUG age: 42
    Average age started photography: 16

    6% of APUG members in their 70s.
    8% in their 60s.
    14% in their 50s.
    30% in their 40s.
    9% in their 30s.
    22% in their 20s.

    Extent of my skills with number data
    Last edited by batwister; 08-05-2012 at 05:11 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  10. #110
    David Lyga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,492
    Interesting how there is a 'deficiency gap' with those in their 30s. - David Lyga



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin