I don't think there's much doubt that the photographer is trying to imitate Hido (who I don't know) but setting aside the fact that I think it's a shame when anyone feels that they must base their work on someone else's, I don't think he's done a bad job and I would go so far as to say that I prefer the imitator's shot of the car and house to Hido's.
Originally Posted by batwister
Agreed (but I think the landscape equals/betters Hido) and it's that obvious intent beyond simple recreation - he's really trying! A lack of imagination can be a dangerous thing.
Originally Posted by Steve Roberts
I think you're reading too much into it, looking at his stream he's got a fairly wide variety of styles, from holga to hassy. With a wide-ranging eye as shown in his stream, there will always be overlap with other's work. I agree there is a grey area - just think of how many 'long exposure of a dock in low light ala Kenna' you've seen [and here's my riff on Atget]... but this guy [tryred62] is - in my opinion - a lot more individual than that.
Last edited by dasBlute; 07-19-2012 at 11:18 AM. Click to view previous post history.
I think your making a very big stretch suggesting this guy is ripping off Hido. My comment on the 4 images given as examples are that Hido is doing nothing original and neither is the other guy.
Why bother obsessing with what someone on Flickr posts? Maybe the Flickr fellow looked at Hido's photographs, and did imitate the ones he liked. Big deal. Maybe all of them he thought up independently. Big deal. Is every photograph of a rose derivative or plagarized from the first photograph of a rose?
Less agony, more photography.
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
I find that most people's evolution in photography is simply that early on they find someone's work they really like that moves them or "fits" them.
Then they set about trying to copy it, firstly to see if they can, and secondly, it motivates them to learn and get better.
From that point a lot of people move on and develop their own style.
But some people never really get the copying right, which is why there are so many Ansel clones. They are stuck in a rut of trying to emulate, that they never develop a style, or else they like what that style is and stay there.
When I started out, I was drawn to faces and skin. I loved lighting and how it made faces beautiful. I found street photography too easy and it had no market. I found scenics too easy as well. But making people beautiful was hard. I started copying and learning and eventually that's the direction I took.
I'm not sure I ever found a style per se, just a way to make people beautiful, and that's what I stuck with. But I copied a lot early on and that's how I learned, as well as dozens of seminars and workshops.
So I have no problem with homage photography really, because I don't think there are many originals who started out doing their own style, without copying from somebody.
It's just a part of an evolutionary process of how artists work. And when you critique them, you are merely picking a point in their evolutionary progression.
I couldn't think of anything witty to say so I left this blank.
Well said Blanksy, this video pretty much sums it all up, Everything is a Remix Part 3, by Kirby Ferguson:
Last edited by zsas; 07-19-2012 at 02:36 PM. Click to view previous post history.
Reason: fix who I was replying to
This Flickr guy has 4-5 shots that were taken EXACTLY where Hido took his. Amazing coincidence if "all of them he thought up independently". Simply amazing.
Originally Posted by Brian C. Miller
When I was in high school a compulsory matter was disegno a mano libera, free-hand sketching with a pencil, the chiaroscuro stuff.
You obviously have to be born for the stuff or ten lives will not be enough to become decent. I think I would need twenty lives. Teachers were compassionate enough.
Anyway your task as a poor young man trying to draw was to copy some Piranesi tables about architectural details. The task and exercise here was to copy as well and as exactly as possible. Copying is a powerful way to learn technique. Personal style comes after.
I don't think there really is anything deeply wrong in what the photographer is doing, I only observe that:
- If he does it as an exercise in technique, this should better be openly declared;
- If he does it as a way to acquire some recognition, then he will just make a fool of himself because the other photographers published first and "exact imitators" only manage to make a fool of themselves.
- The most natural outcome in any case is that this photographer will learn from the copying exercise and he'll almost inevitably arrive to some personal way of seeing. Imitation will have been just a way to learn the technique one day.
Part of me thinks it is an issue worth bringing to Hido's attention. It's not so extreme as to consider action of course - and the uploader is a few pegs beneath Hido in terms of technique and construction of the images - but I believe he's getting pretty close to nailing it.
Originally Posted by rich815
Last edited by batwister; 07-19-2012 at 07:04 PM. Click to view previous post history.