Gallery posts

[cliveh]

I often see the same names of people who post images in the gallery (mine included). But if there are 59,174 members, why don't more people post?

[Thomas Bertilsson]

I've often wondered the same, Clive. It would be wonderful to see more gallery posts from other subscribers. Not that I'm tired of 'the regulars', but a fresh stream of scanned prints is always something to look forward to.

[eddie]

There may be over 59,000 members, but you have to be a subscriber to post photos, right? I'd like to see more subscribers posting images (and supporting the site), too. It costs the equivalent of about 4 rolls of film per year, and is very much worth it.

[cliveh]

There may be over 59,000 members, but you have to be a subscriber to post photos, right? I'd like to see more subscribers posting images (and supporting the site), too. It costs the equivalent of about 4 rolls of film per year, and is very much worth it.

Do we know how many are subscribers?

[eddie]

I don't know how many there are, but there should be more. They're missing some superb, inspiring images.

I also think anyone who has hundreds, or thousands, of posts, but hasn't subscribed is a freeloader.

[jnanian]

hi eddie

i couldn't agree with you more !

- john

[eddie]

Hey John,
I'd like to see what some of the people posting about the Olympic paper negs would say about some of your stuff...

[cliveh]

I also think anyone who has hundreds, or thousands, of posts, but hasn't subscribed is a freeloader.

Then perhaps non subscibers should only be allowed a certain number of posts within a year?

[Thomas Bertilsson]

Hey John,
I'd like to see what some of the people posting about the Olympic paper negs would say about some of your stuff...

Don't go there. Please. Why ruin a perfectly fine thread?

[eddie]

Sorry, Thomas...