Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,526   Posts: 1,543,909   Online: 1057
      
Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678910 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 99

Thread: Infinite shots

  1. #51
    Diapositivo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,844
    Quote Originally Posted by Dali View Post
    Because it fits the theory.
    Fitting the theory is not enough.

    I don't buy the scientific reasoning that something is scientifically true because it fits within one theory which has not yet been contradicted (or improved) by another theory.

    The scientifically correct reasoning would be that until the model (the theory) helps me doing something it is valid within that limited scope. But my limited model is not THE TRUTH. It is just a tool in my knowledge toolbox. And I can get a better tool tomorrow. I can, because it's a tool and not the "ultimate knowledge". It would be impossible to improve on that.

    Saying that the universe is limited because human means do not "see" much beyond a certain (huge) distance and because it is (or appears to be) "expanding" does not sound scientific to me.

    An "infinite" (whatever that means) number of universes could exists and expand, or contract, or play leapfrog with each other without us knowing or suspecting. Even if our "universe" were really expanding (not everybody agrees but that's another point) that doesn't mean it is the only universe or, for that matter, the only KIND of universe. There could be as many different universes as there are different animal species on Earth, and we would be discussing our universe just like a deep-see crab would think there is no universe without water.

    What we call "void" could actually be filled with some sort of substance of which we do not even suspect the existence. And by the way, even if "void " actually exists and is "void", "void" exists so it is and if it is, is part of the infinite, although a void infinite. An infinite void could not be negated.

    This kind of questions will never have and answer because human ability to study this kind of problems stops much before human ability to ask this kind of questions.

    I have nothing against atheism and I guess I have been an atheist (or, rather, a sceptic, which is different) myself but I do find that some atheist scientists try to use science to forward their own prejudicial idea and paint it with scientific objectivity.

    Honest scientists when confronted with this kind of questions just raise their hands and declare the insufficiency of scientific means to give any kind of answer.

    Any other position is IMO motivated by meta-scientific prejudices.
    Last edited by Diapositivo; 11-08-2012 at 12:38 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    Fabrizio Ruggeri fine art photography site: http://fabrizio-ruggeri.artistwebsites.com
    Stock images at Imagebroker: http://www.imagebroker.com/#/search/ib_fbr

  2. #52

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    311
    Images
    10
    I did not mention THE TRUTH as you do, just the knowledge which is totally different and a much less absolute statement.

    Too, when you write that universe is expanding, you implicitely state that it is limited. If it were not the case, it could not expand.
    Last edited by Dali; 11-08-2012 at 01:10 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  3. #53
    Diapositivo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,844
    Quote Originally Posted by Dali View Post
    I did not mention THE TRUTH as you do, just the knowledge which is totally different and a much less absolute statement.

    Too, when you write that universe is expanding, you implicitely state that it is limited. If it were not the case, it could not expand.
    litody in post #11 said "But the universe isn't infinite" which is, so to speak, quite a statement
    Thomas in post #16 referring to the above asked "How do you know?" which is quite legitimate a question;
    Answering him, in post #28 you said: "because it fits the theory".

    I constructed that as if you agreed with litody that "the universe isn't infinite" and that his affirmation is validated by fitting "the theory". Maybe I got it wrong.

    In fact saying that the universe is expanding (not something I can really say I say, rather something I say others say) is limited to a common use or definition of the term "universe", which is more or less what we think expands after that hypothetical big ban. In that sense, universe - the all we can explore around us with our means - appears to be expanding.

    But "Universe" etymologically means "the all" or if you prefer "the everything". Just like "infinite" means "without limits".
    "All" is by definition infinite because we don't know where "all" ends. In this sense the concept of "all" has "no limits". If it had limits it wouldn't be "all" because limits define different sets of the "all".

    So the Universe (the all) must have no limits and be "infinite" just by definition. We refer to the Universe when we mean "all that exists" not "all of that we can have some traces of existence".

    EDIT: correct spelling as evidenced below
    Last edited by Diapositivo; 11-08-2012 at 06:46 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    Fabrizio Ruggeri fine art photography site: http://fabrizio-ruggeri.artistwebsites.com
    Stock images at Imagebroker: http://www.imagebroker.com/#/search/ib_fbr

  4. #54

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    39
    what does ethimologically mean ?

  5. #55
    lxdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Redlands, So. Calif.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,646
    Etymologically, from etymology. The study of word origins and the origin and evolution of word meanings.
    I do use a digital device in my photographic pursuits when necessary.
    When someone rags on me for using film, I use a middle digit, upraised.

  6. #56
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    8,595
    Images
    122
    Not just one, an infinite number of identical shots will be taken by an infinite number of monkeys.


    Steve.
    "People who say things won't work are a dime a dozen. People who figure out how to make things work are worth a fortune" - Dave Rat.

  7. #57

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    311
    Images
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Diapositivo View Post
    So the Universe (the all) must have no limits and be "infinite" just by definition. We refer to the Universe when we mean "all that exists" not "all of that we can have some traces of existence".
    It is not because something has no limit that it is infinite. The surface of a sphere has no limit but is finite.

    But we far from the original topic, monkeys and Leica II...

  8. #58
    cliveh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,304
    Images
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by Dali View Post
    It is not because something has no limit that it is infinite. The surface of a sphere has no limit but is finite.

    But we far from the original topic, monkeys and Leica II...
    Can you explain why the surface of a sphere has no limit?

    “The contemplation of things as they are, without error or confusion, without substitution or imposture, is in itself a nobler thing than a whole harvest of invention”

    Francis Bacon

  9. #59

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    743
    Because for a sufficiently small sphere (for example), I can wrap a sheet of 8.5"x11" (or A4, for those using the metric standard) completely around it. Now you would agree that a sheet of paper has a finite surface area, so why wouldn't a sphere also have a finite surface area? If a sphere had an infinite surface area, it would take an infinitely large sheet of paper (or an infinite amount of paint) to cover it. Yet you can travel an infinite distance on the surface of the finite sphere (granted you will be traveling over the same points at some point).

    Topography (the study of surfaces) makes my brain hurt.
    ME Super

    Shoot more film.
    There are eight ways to put a slide into a projector tray. Seven of them are wrong.

  10. #60
    cliveh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,304
    Images
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Smith View Post
    Not just one, an infinite number of identical shots will be taken by an infinite number of monkeys.


    Steve.
    But how will they all get in the same position at that point in time?

    “The contemplation of things as they are, without error or confusion, without substitution or imposture, is in itself a nobler thing than a whole harvest of invention”

    Francis Bacon



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin