I am not sure I buy the zoom lens scenario. The image does not seem to be compressed the way zooms do it. He may have been too far away, I was not there, I can't say. What I can say is that the paper published this photo to get people to buy the paper. Death sells, unfortunately.
Originally Posted by Brian C. Miller
Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI
So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004
Well the only people who do know what happened, were there, and also the ones who have seen the sequence of photos that were taken. Everyone else is speculating. The paper sells papers, if they had a good bloody shot of the aftermath, that would have been in or on the paper as well. Well maybe in europe, it might have been too gory for the "politically correct" in north america.
If there was nothing I could do, then yes I would take the photo. More importantly I would publish the photo. The conversation of safety is being brought up again in part because of the photo.
The photo in this book springs to mind
After it was published there were fewer incidents
Also, before criticizing the man, keep in mind the bystander effect. In most situations people don't do anything because they believe someone else will.
Bachelor of Fine Arts and Bachelor of Arts: Journalism - University of Arkansas 2014
Canon A-1, Canon AE-1, Canon Canonet GIII 17, Argus 21, Rolleicord Va, Mamiya RB67, Voigtländer Bessa
There's no proof without video... The photograph is a flawed means of documentation. Discuss.
Well, OK, perhaps to a certain degree, but especially if the still camera does not have a motordrive in use at the time.
Originally Posted by batwister
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
There was a short interview with the photographer this morning on the national news. He indicated that he was not strong enough to pull the man back up onto the platform. Perhaps, but you would think most people would try.
However, events like this may unfold very quickly, and for many people there is a lag time for the brain to process the information before any action can be taken. It is much easier to analyze an event afterwards that you did not witness first hand and say "I would have done such and such."
The man would still be alive if the architects and engineers who built the N.Y. Subway had done it right. In the Stockholm, Sweden subway, there is a one-meter space next to the track that extends under the platform, providing refuge for anyone who falls off the platform onto the tracks.
Frankly, it's surprising the New York subway has not already been successfully sued for such an obvious and deadly design flaw.
Originally Posted by Bob-D659
I wouldn't term that as an issue of political correctness. That's just wrong, I think.
Develop, stop, fix.... wait.... where's my film?
back in 1986 i was in the boston subway, the redline at park street.
there is an island in the middle and a train on either side.
i had a camera with me, doing a little street ( well underground ) stuff
and a drunk fell down the stairs and pushed someone into the tracks
he missed the 3rd rail but there was a train coming .. i dropped my camera and ran to help
the guy ... a t policeman had already jumped in the tracks and pulled the person out ...
i can't imagine how a photographer or anyone wouldn't jump to help someone in distress
what a lame world we live in ..
That people's lives are in the hands of dubious onlookers (or voyeurs) as soon as they're down there - whether injured or not - is ludicrous. It's amazing that there isn't some kind of foothold on the wall, which was the first thing I thought when looking at the photo, as the man clearly has some strength. It's certainly not the classic image of a helpless dame tied to the tracks.
Originally Posted by Benoît99
Just to add a strange thought. We're clearly so desensitised to such images, that when reality happens, we're stifled in our anticipation of an image - the information. I don't think it's merely shock or cowardice that nobody did anything, it's that we're vegetables, waiting to be stimulated. I think we become cameras in those situations, unconsciously holding still, waiting for something to click. Having a camera just makes you more conscious of the 'picture' unfolding, but never the reality. We're too detached to accept something like that as a tangible reality, in our culture. Perhaps it's the people who don't watch TV who save the day, because all the people who do are so used to waiting for the hero to arrive!
Last edited by batwister; 12-05-2012 at 08:08 PM. Click to view previous post history.