Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 76,322   Posts: 1,681,957   Online: 684
      
Page 16 of 28 FirstFirst ... 61011121314151617181920212226 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 273
  1. #151
    Dinesh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,634
    Quote Originally Posted by cliveh View Post
    Because I don't feel it is an ethical development of photographic technology. .
    I'm not sure I follow. Are you suggesting that digital photography is somehow unethical?
    Kick his ass, Sea Bass!

  2. #152
    cliveh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,249
    Images
    348
    Quote Originally Posted by Dinesh View Post
    I'm not sure I follow. Are you suggesting that digital photography is somehow unethical?
    Not at all, but I am suggesting some aspects of the commercialisation of digital photography are.

    “The contemplation of things as they are, without error or confusion, without substitution or imposture, is in itself a nobler thing than a whole harvest of invention”

    Francis Bacon

  3. #153
    clayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, CA | Kuching, MY | Jakarta, ID
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,837
    Images
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by cliveh View Post
    Not at all, but I am suggesting some aspects of the commercialisation of digital photography are.
    Absolutely agreed.
    Stop worrying about grain, resolution, sharpness, and everything else that doesn't have a damn thing to do with substance.

    http://www.flickr.com/kediwah

  4. #154
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta, GA USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,765
    I insisted from the beginning we should use some other word for digital, like maybe the original "imaging." I got into a weird exchange on LFPF about that where someone basically dared me to contact some war (digital) photographer and tell him he wasn't a real photographer, which of course is not what I ever meant or implied. I didn't mean he wasn't "real" or his work wasn't valuable or legitimate. I meant that it was inherently something else.

    Others point out that photography means something like "painting with light" and you're still doing that. Yeahyeah, but it's still something else - not necessarily worse but different.

    I seem to be a voice in the wilderness aside from maybe here on APUG though.

  5. #155
    bobwysiwyg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI U.S.A.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,604
    Images
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Cole View Post
    I insisted from the beginning we should use some other word for digital, like maybe the original "imaging." I got into a weird exchange on LFPF about that where someone basically dared me to contact some war (digital) photographer and tell him he wasn't a real photographer, which of course is not what I ever meant or implied. I didn't mean he wasn't "real" or his work wasn't valuable or legitimate. I meant that it was inherently something else.

    Others point out that photography means something like "painting with light" and you're still doing that. Yeahyeah, but it's still something else - not necessarily worse but different.

    I seem to be a voice in the wilderness aside from maybe here on APUG though.
    I'll bet 19th century painters said the same thing about the first photographs.
    WYSIWYG - At least that's my goal.

    Portfolio-http://apug.org/forums/portfolios.php?u=25518

  6. #156
    blansky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Wine country in Northern California
    Posts
    5,546
    Quote Originally Posted by cliveh View Post
    When digital photography appeared I had no problem with it and found it a great addition to analogue to further the boundaries of what could be achieved. The problem I had was when it was hijacked by marketing men to make money and put digital as a technological replacement over film.
    But to 90% of professional photographers, portrait, commercial, product, fashion, forensic, photojournalism, etc it DID replace analog.

    And to 95% of amateur photographers it DID replace analog.

    It wasn't hijacked by marketers, the marketers worked for the companies that invented/developed the medium.

    And it did replace analog for very good reasons, or all these pros would not be using it. They weren't sold a bill of goods, the advantages were and are very real.

    Now you can argue that it's for better or for worse but nobody was hoodwinked into this conversion. I converted very late in the game for the main reason I wasn't convinced yet that the materials were archival, now I am.

    And nobody is denying its not a cash cow for corporations but if the benefits were not there, the conversion would not have followed.

    I know, everyone has a story of someone who "went back" but one in a million is not a trend, it's just a personal choice.
    I couldn't think of anything witty to say so I left this blank.

  7. #157
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta, GA USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,765
    Quote Originally Posted by bobwysiwyg View Post
    I'll bet 19th century painters said the same thing about the first photographs.
    Huh? That doesn't make any sense. Photography was NEVER called "painting" as far as I am aware (other than by the linguistic meaning of the term) so why would painters "say the same thing?"

    I'm just saying that the two media are sufficiently different they should be CALLED different arts, just as painting is not the same as sculpture, though a better analogy might be watercolors versus oils or such - both are painting but they are definitely not the same art form.

  8. #158
    blansky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Wine country in Northern California
    Posts
    5,546
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Cole View Post
    I insisted from the beginning we should use some other word for digital, like maybe the original "imaging." I got into a weird exchange on LFPF about that where someone basically dared me to contact some war (digital) photographer and tell him he wasn't a real photographer, which of course is not what I ever meant or implied. I didn't mean he wasn't "real" or his work wasn't valuable or legitimate. I meant that it was inherently something else.

    Others point out that photography means something like "painting with light" and you're still doing that. Yeahyeah, but it's still something else - not necessarily worse but different.

    I seem to be a voice in the wilderness aside from maybe here on APUG though.
    I don't disagree that it should have different terminology but language rarely seems to work that way. The word photography, even before digital had a lot of avenues for pursuit. A photograph had a lot of different processes and still ended up in someone's hand as a photograph.

    The insipid giclee floated around for a while, not sure if its still here or not, but galleries used to specify silver halide vs giclee or platinum. But I agree different terminology could be helpful.

    I still say I'm going for a jacuzzi, and someone else will say you mean go sit in the hot tub, and someone will correct them and say no a hot tub was that round wooden barrel thing. You mean you're going to sit in your spa. And I say no, a spa is where women go when their husbands go golfing ........whatever.

    I'll be in the water trough thing with the bubbles.
    Last edited by blansky; 08-26-2013 at 07:40 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    I couldn't think of anything witty to say so I left this blank.

  9. #159
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta, GA USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,765
    Yeah, giclee is still around. My art loving wife asked me what it meant and I think was a little disappointed when I explained it was just high-brow speak for "ink jet."

    Not that ink jet prints can't be really good - I've seen some - but it's still an ink jet. Dressing it up in pretentious French doesn't change anything but make the one doing the labeling look pretentious if not downright silly, IMHO.

  10. #160
    blansky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Wine country in Northern California
    Posts
    5,546
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Cole View Post
    Yeah, giclee is still around. My art loving wife asked me what it meant and I think was a little disappointed when I explained it was just high-brow speak for "ink jet."

    Not that ink jet prints can't be really good - I've seen some - but it's still an ink jet. Dressing it up in pretentious French doesn't change anything but make the one doing the labeling look pretentious if not downright silly, IMHO.
    Giclee actually comes from the French word to spurt or squirt. Use your imagination.

    Officious lady in a gallery....yes ma'am, this picture was spurted and squirted on. And it costs $10,000.
    I couldn't think of anything witty to say so I left this blank.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin