Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,770   Posts: 1,484,222   Online: 945
      
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
  1. #1
    Mainecoonmaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,728
    Images
    6
    "Photography, like surfing, is an infinite process, a constantly evolving exploration of life."
    Aaron Chang

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,550
    Ain't that somthing!

    Jeff

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    California desert
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    313

    isn't

    This "news" is not news. Many, many parks and so on have required permits and a minimum amount of insurance for professional photographers to make use of the space. And have done so for years.
    Professional photographers, including movie crews, can be a great big pain in the neck. A lot of film and TV shows have been shot in Southern California and they love to hog the streets, clog the traffic and try to tell people they cannot go on their own property or park in front of their own house.
    LAPD cops in uniform complete with badge and gun will hassle citizens and you will find out that the cops are, in fact, moonlighting for the film or TV producers. They act like God decreed that their film be made -- like it is a sacred undertaking.
    Still photogs and video shooters without permits will use pubic and national parks to shoot porn and if your kiddies are there -- tough.
    Professional photographers act professionally -- they get the proper permits and insurance.
    Of course this can present a minor hassle or a non-professional photog who just wants to take some photos with a "professional-looking" camera, whatever that is.
    Thomas Jefferson said that eternal vigilance is the price of liberty. When is the last time you went down to city hall and told them how you feel? Do you belong to a photogs' organization that lobbies and hollers for what they want? Preaching to the choir won't cut it.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,798
    Oh, snapguy.... how long I could rant on that topic. I HATE that and my commute is lengthened about 30 minutes quite frequently because those activities clos a major thoroughfare and cause huge volumes of traffic to share a much smaller intersection. What's worse... more than half the time they aren't shooting... just occupying. But the city makes lots of much needed money from the movie business and this is part of it. So it a 'grin and bear it' situation. I have more problem with the moonlighting cops who misuse city resources and authority to support these activities. And when they are complete jerks... I have even more of a problem because there is literally nothing we can do about it but grumble.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    746
    Dorthy: "Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore".

    Toto: "Good! Arf"!

  6. #6
    cliveh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    2,728
    Images
    336
    I note it says professional photographers would be required to purchase permits if they wanted to shoot in any of the city’s public parks. Who is to say they are professional? Surely this law would be unenforceable?

    “The contemplation of things as they are, without error or confusion, without substitution or imposture, is in itself a nobler thing than a whole harvest of invention”

    Francis Bacon

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Hamilton, Ont, Canada
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    980
    Around here, it's about wedding photographers in the park. In part, limiting the numbers, so there are no conflicts amongst bridal parties or overwhelming public use. As to taxplayers use, professional photographers making money off public property usually does involve a fee.
    "There are a great many things I am in doubt about at the moment, and I should consider myself favoured if you would kindly enlighten me. Signed, Doubtful, off to Canada." (BJP 1914).

    Regards
    Bill

  8. #8
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Ignacio, CO, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,302
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Mark Barendt, Ignacio, CO

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  9. #9
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,481
    I know at least one public building where you have to pay if you use it as background for portrait work.
    I don't know whether one differs between commercial and non commercial work. But some commercial photographers use it regularly and by this most likely will identify themselves.

  10. #10
    lxdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Redlands, So. Calif.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,459
    Quote Originally Posted by snapguy View Post
    Still photogs and video shooters without permits will use pubic ... parks to shoot porn
    Didn't know about those- I'll have to check them out. Do you know if any are around here?
    I do use a digital device in my photographic pursuits when necessary.
    When someone rags on me for using film, I use a middle digit, upraised.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin