Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,929   Posts: 1,556,838   Online: 791
      
Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst 1234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 149
  1. #41

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lower Earth
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,051
    Actually, I don't see any difference between setting everything manually and using an AE camera that gives you speed and aperture readings in the viewfinder, and an exposure lock feature. It gives all the information that you would get by manually doing things, and does it it a lot faster. If you really are a beginner then stop down metering is hard to beat because it allows you to visually see the effects of aperture adjustments and DOF.

    I use cameras w/ no meter, a manual meter, and AE metering every time I go shooting and I would much rather use the AE camera w/ exposure lock because it's not only faster, it frees my mind and eye to do the important stuff like focus and composition. It's pretty much the same as shooting a scale focus Retina that I have everything all set to before putting it up to my eye to shoot, but w/ AE I don't have to remember to preset the focus and lens/shutter settings.
    Last edited by momus; 01-25-2014 at 01:45 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  2. #42
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Central florida,USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,622
    Images
    1
    I,for one, are very happy with auto-ecerythingand my camera is set to it.now, I can finally concentrate in the image-making process and forget about the image-taking process.
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  3. #43
    L Gebhardt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    NH - Live Free or Die
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,708
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    18
    There's nothing wrong with learning on an auto exposure camera. For the most part the Matrix metering on Nikons is right where I'd set it. When I use my Nikons they are almost always in Aperture priority mode. My film comes out exposed the same as when I use my manual spot meter on large format or the Hasselblad. So if a beginner can let the camera deal with the exposure while they focus on composition (which in my mind includes the aperture) I don't see anything wrong with that. Now fully automatic focus is another issue.

  4. #44

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    790
    FART for good photos, according to Ken Rockwell. Its an acronym that is easy to remember.

    1. Feel the urge to take a photo.
    2. Ask yourself what it is that made you want to take a photograph.
    3. Refine your photograph once you have answered the previous question.
    4. Take the picture.

    This is what KR says he does. Its a remarkably simple yet effective way to photograph landscapes at least. Feel, Ask, Refine, Take. I've noticed in my own photography that if I don't go past feel, my picture isn't as good as if I go through the whole process. Auto exposure with the in-camera meter gives me a starting point for the refine process, because I can choose the aperture or shutter speed to get the result I want without having to set that third leg of the ISO/aperture/shutter speed triangle. I would argue, if pressed, that I do understand photography, even if I choose to let the camera do some of the thinking for me.
    ME Super

    Shoot more film.
    There are eight ways to put a slide into a projector tray. Seven of them are wrong.

  5. #45
    Nikanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by pbromaghin View Post
    As others have said above, use good equipment and you will get good pictures. If you want to expand beyond that, you better know what you're doing because your brain has to substitute for all that electronic brain power. Do you know more than a computer? Good luck, buddy.
    There is nothing difficult about using a camera in manual, not unless the lens is difficult to turn or the camera is difficult to lift, it's not difficult. The brain power is not substituting the computer, it's the reverse, and the computer has done a horrible job if that was it's task. The computer is an interface, just as the knobs and dials are an interface. When using the camera manually, you interact with the camera, when using it automatically , you consult with the computer that interacts with the camera. That computer is incapable of the creative decisions you make for simple tasks the photographer directly wants the camera to accomplish when the shutter is tripped. The computer may know a lot, but it's not able to do very much with what it knows, and if it could, what would be the point? This is really irrelevant to the idea of using a camera "manually".

    If anything it is much more complex to get a desired result when haggling with an unintelligent machine.

  6. #46

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lower Michigan, USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    376
    Quote Originally Posted by L Gebhardt View Post
    So if a beginner can let the camera deal with the exposure while they focus on composition (which in my mind includes the aperture) I don't see anything wrong with that. Now fully automatic focus is another issue.
    The problem is that many (most) never actually learn about exposure. They still get decent photos, but they don't understand how or why they did it.

    If end result is the only goal, then fine.

    I just consider it a couple steps away from being a traditional, well-schooled photographer. Then again, the same can be said for a lot of things, like development and printing - I would agree with those being a requirement for, in my mind, a "true" photographer. I don't necessarily qualify, I'm still an amateur picture taker, but slowly working on it. This, by the way, has nothing to do with selling photos. Plenty of folks sell photos, not all of them are photographers.
    Last edited by LyleB; 01-26-2014 at 06:49 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  7. #47

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,100
    all wrong borrow a box camera load it with ISO400 remember to wind on between shots it is like discarding part of bikini if you are girl…

  8. #48
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,770
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by Nikanon View Post
    There is nothing difficult about using a camera in manual, not unless the lens is difficult to turn or the camera is difficult to lift, it's not difficult. The brain power is not substituting the computer, it's the reverse, and the computer has done a horrible job if that was it's task. The computer is an interface, just as the knobs and dials are an interface. When using the camera manually, you interact with the camera, when using it automatically , you consult with the computer that interacts with the camera. That computer is incapable of the creative decisions you make for simple tasks the photographer directly wants the camera to accomplish when the shutter is tripped. The computer may know a lot, but it's not able to do very much with what it knows, and if it could, what would be the point? This is really irrelevant to the idea of using a camera "manually".

    If anything it is much more complex to get a desired result when haggling with an unintelligent machine.
    When we end up "haggling" with a camera, we are really just haggling with it's meter and where it wants to focus.

    The problem isn't that the camera's meter or auto-focus system or it's processing algorithms are "unintelligent"; it is simply that the camera's meter is a reflective metering system and our preferred focus point might not be exactly where you want to point the camera for the final shot.

    The problem, like most photographic problems, is our failure to understand what the system needs to do a good job.

    Modern matrix metering systems do a really good job of setting exposure without our intervention for the grand majority of shots, but it is still a reflective metering system with all the same inherent problems. The camera has to deal with what we show it and sometimes we don't show the meter or the auto-focus system the right subject matter.

    This is nothing new, it has been a problem for ALL TTL cameras, manual or auto, since they first came into being.

    Modern cameras give us a variety of focus/exposure points we can pick from so that we can refine the exposure and focus, we are telling the meter/camera what's most important. This is also why many new cameras are being designed to "look for faces". The thought behind all this is basically the old idea of pointing the camera away from the composition that we really want to place the focus point or split prism on the most important subject matter in the scene, setting exposure and focus while we are there, and then recomposing to get what we want.

    Older cameras that lack selectable points, like the N90s and a plethora of others, can do can solve this issue by recomposing.

    Many modern cameras, anything on par with say a Nikon F100 or better, have easy over-rides to solve these problems completely and even separately making these cameras potentially much faster and more accurate to use than any manual camera without ever changing the grip we hold the camera with. These cameras can be pointed away from the final composition, exposure can be found and locked with one button, then auto-focus can be used separately to track the subject or locked based on a specific point.

    I use this two button technique when shooting sports and weddings especially. Any place where there is high contrast and subjects moving between lighting situations. My daughter did junior olympic kayaking and it was very normal for one frame to have the main subject in full shade with bright white foaming water in full sun filling the rest of the frame 75 feet away, the next frame to have full sun for everything 10 feet away, the frame after that full shade for everything 20 feet away.

    I think people get overwhelmed with all the choices available on the modern cameras and their big manuals, what I think most miss though is that most of these cameras get programmed once, not every time it turns on. I also believe that most people don't know the fancy cameras like F100's and better can be programmed to be able to use exactly the same clues they already use with their manual cameras, instead the cameras are simply judged as delivered from the factory.

    As I age my eyes are getting harder to use, I recently divested myself of all my manual focus 35mm gear because of this.

    Like RalphLambrecht I have found this to be a boon, not a bane. I have more time and brain power available to pay attention to what I'm actually taking pictures of, and I can engage with and enjoy my subjects with fewer distractions.

    It's not hard to run a camera manually, but it is harder and slower than using an automated camera.
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  9. #49
    Nikanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by markbarendt View Post
    When we end up "haggling" with a camera, we are really just haggling with it's meter and where it wants to focus.

    The problem isn't that the camera's meter or auto-focus system or it's processing algorithms are "unintelligent"; it is simply that the camera's meter is a reflective metering system and our preferred focus point might not be exactly where you want to point the camera for the final shot.

    The problem, like most photographic problems, is our failure to understand what the system needs to do a good job.

    Modern matrix metering systems do a really good job of setting exposure without our intervention for the grand majority of shots, but it is still a reflective metering system with all the same inherent problems. The camera has to deal with what we show it and sometimes we don't show the meter or the auto-focus system the right subject matter.

    This is nothing new, it has been a problem for ALL TTL cameras, manual or auto, since they first came into being.

    Modern cameras give us a variety of focus/exposure points we can pick from so that we can refine the exposure and focus, we are telling the meter/camera what's most important. This is also why many new cameras are being designed to "look for faces". The thought behind all this is basically the old idea of pointing the camera away from the composition that we really want to place the focus point or split prism on the most important subject matter in the scene, setting exposure and focus while we are there, and then recomposing to get what we want.

    Older cameras that lack selectable points, like the N90s and a plethora of others, can do can solve this issue by recomposing.

    Many modern cameras, anything on par with say a Nikon F100 or better, have easy over-rides to solve these problems completely and even separately making these cameras potentially much faster and more accurate to use than any manual camera without ever changing the grip we hold the camera with. These cameras can be pointed away from the final composition, exposure can be found and locked with one button, then auto-focus can be used separately to track the subject or locked based on a specific point.

    I use this two button technique when shooting sports and weddings especially. Any place where there is high contrast and subjects moving between lighting situations. My daughter did junior olympic kayaking and it was very normal for one frame to have the main subject in full shade with bright white foaming water in full sun filling the rest of the frame 75 feet away, the next frame to have full sun for everything 10 feet away, the frame after that full shade for everything 20 feet away.
    This is basically the haggling I was talking about. Although I'm referring mostly to personal work where you are not getting paid and not being forced to make certain kinds of pictures. This is all very complex stuff, it's really a hassle as compared to setting the camera as one enters a new lighting situation and leaving it there until you enter another one. If you're talking about 1/1000 of a second, the extra haggling matters. Cameras of any kind are unintelligent. They can acquire information but not apply it. My point in saying that is that using an automatic feature assumes the camera will understand your intention based on where you point it. Autofocus in many situations will focus on an undesired location requiring refocusing or causing defocus. "Average metering scan be easily overwhelmed by an imbalance in intensity. Yes there are times when a user will get lucky and the camera focus and expose as desired, but the fact that that is not a 100% ratio and that mistakes are then made by both the photographer and the computer, there are more headaches created. I don't care much what camera it is, relatively old or new, Nikon D4, or a Sinar P2, just setting the shutter, the aperture, and focus, and having that shutter trip when the button is pressed is essential.

  10. #50
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,770
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by Nikanon View Post
    My point in saying that is that using an automatic feature assumes the camera will understand your intention based on where you point it.
    It is never the camera, or the meter, or the fancy computer in them, that screws up.

    As long as our cameras/meters are in good repair and have full batteries where needed, we only have ourselves to blame.
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst 1234567891011 ... LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin