Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 75,802   Posts: 1,671,665   Online: 897
      
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 39
  1. #1
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,033
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19

    Shooting Volume and Editing

    So I was thinking a bit after watching this video http://www.theatlantic.com/video/arc...ograph/243936/

    In this instance Sam Abell has a keeper ratio of roughly 1:3,125 (8 photos used of 25,000 shots)

    Given Sam Abell's skill level, I'm guessing that if we were given the chance to look we might find a few more usable shots among the 24,992 rejects but this begs several questions for most of us: Are we shooting enough to get what we really want? Do we expect too much of a given roll of film or 25-pack of sheets? Do we experiment enough?

    There is also in there a very telling moment in the video where Sam Abell talks about the shot he's been searching for, for a year, isn't good enough. That though brings up another good point, good set of questions for us: How many do we toss? How high is our bar? How many are we willing to edit out, even if we don't have a workable shot? Do we throw enough away?

    A similar thought suggesting that volume is important “Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson

    So where do you stand on these questions/ideas?

    (BTW, No I'm not suggesting we need to shoot 25,000 shots to get 8)
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,449
    Consider the context. This is documentary photography. Take a lot of pictures, use only the best ones. Other photographers, who make deliberate photographs as opposed to taking on sight pictures, might have a different ratio.

    PS: I AM NOT diminishing Sam Abell ...

  3. #3
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,033
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by David Brown View Post
    Consider the context. This is documentary photography. Take a lot of pictures, use only the best ones. Other photographers, who make deliberate photographs as opposed to taking on sight pictures, might have a different ratio.

    PS: I AM NOT diminishing Sam Abell ...
    I know you aren't picking on Abell.

    Abell though, in the video, describes how he decided early in the project how he wanted a very specific photo to end the story with, then he spends 1-1/2 years to plan it, to find the spot, to figure out the composition once found, and finally to make another trip across the continent get the right light and situation. To me that's pretty deliberate even if he did a lot of experimentation along the way.

    A local guy in my area, Bill Proud, similarly will plan shots over quite long timeframes. Bill shoots 4x5 and is much more frugal maybe using 2 or 4 sheets for a shot he way have waited for several years.

    I don't think either is wrong in their approach. Each has a system that works for them.

    Personally when I shoot more, I start seeing more. Another advantage I find in shooting more is acclimatizing my subjects to what I'm doing and the inevitability of me getting their photo, this is truly helpful when shooting events for both candids and formal shots. The extra shots also help me "learn my subject better".
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  4. #4
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,033
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by snapguy View Post
    He was just a smal cog in a big, inefficient machine.
    I feel like that at work.
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  5. #5
    jnanian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    18,107
    Blog Entries
    14
    Images
    71
    mark, photography is a weird thing.
    i have photographed the same thing, sometimes for 10 years
    and still not found the photograph i wanted. i have come close a few times
    but it has not appeared on my film yet. sometimes i ride shot gun and
    my wife might say - you are photographing THAT again ? ...
    its like a snow leopard ...

    the makers of that video should have mention
    to stay in the concept of the subject ...
    it took 9 months of 40hour weeks
    to get the footage for that 10 minute video

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Southern USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,808
    The problem with this approach is that you learn nothing. Whether you get a good shot or not depends on blind staggering luck. Good photographers create their photographs. It's not expensive to run through several rolls of film BUT nothing focuses the mind better than shooting LF. As far as HCB is concerned there are some who would say that he never got out of the first 10,000 photographs.
    Last edited by Gerald C Koch; 06-22-2014 at 10:30 AM. Click to view previous post history.
    A rock pile ceases to be a rock pile the moment a single man contemplates it, bearing within him the image of a cathedral.

    ~Antoine de Saint-Exupery

  7. #7
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,033
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by jnanian View Post
    the makers of that video should have mention
    to stay in the concept of the subject ...
    it took 9 months of 40hour weeks
    to get the footage for that 10 minute video
    Damn straight. There is a lot of work that "outsiders" don't see that goes into good work of any type.
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  8. #8
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,033
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by Gerald C Koch View Post
    The problem with this approach is that you learn nothing.
    I might suggest that it's a different way of learning.
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  9. #9
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,033
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by markbarendt View Post
    I might suggest that it's a different way of learning.
    Took a walk and had a bit more time to think on this.

    One thing that has been very true about volume in my world is that it gets me better at the mechanics and the craft, as well as the art: this follows HCB's thought more than NG's way of doing business.

    With my Nikons, film and digital combined, I'm probably significantly over 300,000 shots in the last 10 years and the grand majority of those came in the first 3-4 years. One thing that this volume has done is eliminate any guess-work with my cameras and lenses. I don't have to look at the camera to find anything I normally use. When something stops working, I know why/what step I missed or what got bumped, and how to right it.

    A huge percentage of these shots have simply been to test something: How does this feature work? What does the DOF look like in this situation? Do I get more reliable results with AF or manual? What happens when I place mid-tones at x vs y? What do I have to do to use an FM2's meter to place subjects as reliably as my incident meter does. Does a subject look better centered or at 1/3 high or low or left or right? Backlit, cross lit, or front-lit? HP5 vs Delta 400? Incident vs spot? Matrix balanced fill flash vs A mode? Bounce vs fill? How far can I over/under-expose Portra, XP2, FP4... Does this composition or that one work better.
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  10. #10
    jnanian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    18,107
    Blog Entries
    14
    Images
    71
    Quote Originally Posted by markbarendt View Post

    I don't think either is wrong in their approach. Each has a system that works for them.

    Personally when I shoot more, I start seeing more. Another advantage I find in shooting more is acclimatizing my subjects to what I'm doing and the inevitability of me getting their photo, this is truly helpful when shooting events for both candids and formal shots. The extra shots also help me "learn my subject better".
    the last sentence says it for me mark
    the more you shoot something, the more you understand it
    whether it is the equipment, lighting, film, developer or subject.
    i have a thing for shooting underpasses as i go under them. different times of day
    piers, plank buttresses, drainage infrastructure, blinding light no light slow fast shutter flash
    through windows out sunroof or windows different formats lenses, seasons traffic &c and the more i expose the different things
    i realize or see or understand. so while i may have exposed 300+ views and not gotten the one i want,
    i might not know what i want until i can't shoot that subject or that bridge or that light or ? anymore
    and i will be forced to look at all the frames and pick out the one that i think IS the bridge.
    if my background was an engineer or construction or inspector i would look for 1 thing (maybe)
    but as a bystander i look for something else .. and luckily i havent found it yet so every time i photograph it it
    is almost a new experience.
    as someone with a camera i learn by seeing sometimes,
    and as a historian i learn by asking questions
    and i find nothing wrong with questioning and seeing at the same time ( if that makes sense )

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin