Switch to English Language Passer en langue franšaise Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 74,635   Posts: 1,648,134   Online: 1152
      
Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 85
  1. #21
    benjiboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    U.K.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,800
    Not again, this perennial self conscious question that people who take photographs keep asking themselves because they feel they are the poor relations of fine art, I'm out of here.
    Ben

  2. #22
    jovo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Jacksonville, Florida
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,103
    Images
    208
    Quote Originally Posted by benjiboy View Post
    Not again, this perennial self conscious question that people who take photographs keep asking themselves because they feel they are the poor relations of fine art, I'm out of here.
    Perhaps he biggest threat to continuing to regard photographs as art comes from the passive response by photographers to that perception. It's not just a self-conscious question, it's the defeatist attitude that accepts it. Allowing art to be defined by others without some aggressive pushback is what makes us feel like poor relations.
    John Voss

    My Blog

  3. #23
    Jim Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rural NW Missouri
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,996
    Quote Originally Posted by CatLABS View Post
    Art is what you get to call stuff after you spent a quarter mil that will never come back on "education", everything else is finger painting.
    Don't underestimate finger painting. It can be elevated to fine art in the hands (or fingers?) of an artist or by a competent gallery manager. A few years ago I met a talented artist from McLouth KS who was selling her finger paintings for thousands, and they were a bargain compared to many gallery offerings.

  4. #24
    Jaf-Photo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    496
    Photography was not generally accepted as an artform until the late 60's early 70's.

    But now it certainly is.

    Art galleries and museums do exhibit a lot of photography.

  5. #25
    SuzanneR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,779
    Images
    140
    The analogy to poetry is apt... I've often thought of photography as being its own language. Like language the words can become art, document, novel, poetry, etc.

    I think intent is important, but not as valuable as, say, persistence. I consider many of the pictures I make to be art, and many to be snapshots. Sometimes, I intend to make art, but end up with snaps, and sometimes the snaps elevate themselves to art without my really trying. Art is what we say it is (and I daresay, we have Duchamp' Fountain to thank for that notion). For me, photography is often art, sometimes it's just a photograph, and sometimes it's bad art, but still art.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,589
    I don't see a problem with the question "what is/isn't art?" coming up every so often. However I do think it is a futile discussion topic (other than for the sake of discussion/debate) because regardless of how academic you want to be about it, ultimately it is a matter of individual opinion. I don't think a consensus can ever be reached.

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,427
    Quote Originally Posted by SuzanneR View Post
    The analogy to poetry is apt... I've often thought of photography as being its own language. Like language the words can become art, document, novel, poetry, etc.

    I think intent is important, but not as valuable as, say, persistence. I consider many of the pictures I make to be art, and many to be snapshots. Sometimes, I intend to make art, but end up with snaps, and sometimes the snaps elevate themselves to art without my really trying. Art is what we say it is (and I daresay, we have Duchamp' Fountain to thank for that notion). For me, photography is often art, sometimes it's just a photograph, and sometimes it's bad art, but still art.

  8. #28
    Jaf-Photo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    496
    I think the discussion of good art vs bad art is even more contentious than the discussion of art vs non-art.

    Sometimes great art is created with no intention at all. One example from photography is Eugene Atget. He was something of a professional failure who took to photographing backgrounds and objects, to sell these photos for use in painters' studios.

    He and his photos were derided by art critics at the time (early 20th century France) but now he's seen as one of the fathers of photography.
    Last edited by Jaf-Photo; 07-09-2014 at 11:52 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  9. #29
    Eric Rose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Calgary AB, Canada
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    4,309
    Images
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by jnanian View Post
    once in a blue moon it is art ... most of the time it is just a photograph
    So very very true.
    www.ericrose.com
    yourbaddog.com

    "civility is not a sign of weakness" JFK

    "The Dude abides" - the Dude

  10. #30
    lxdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Redlands, So. Calif.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,857
    This photograph is, without a doubt, Art.

    http://www.lamiradatheatre.com/images/art.jpg
    I do use a digital device in my photographic pursuits when necessary.
    When someone rags on me for using film, I use a middle digit, upraised.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  Ś   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin