Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,562   Posts: 1,573,315   Online: 1048
      
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Results 51 to 52 of 52
  1. #51

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    10
    If you can be fast, and provide good images, it really doesn't matter what you use as a pro.

    Today, some people might be a bit picky about grain in images. So to avoid that you can use a larger format (depending on the output size), and if you can process and scan it fast enough to compete with others, you can do it.

    It's like in stock photography. Nobody cares how you shot it, as long as you give them a large clean file without digital or film artefacts of any kind. If you have direct contact with customers, add speed of work to that and you have a golden rule.

  2. #52
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,076
    Images
    1
    A professional wedding photog friend of mine shoots film exclusively. He uses a 35mm for photo journalit style stuff during the reception and uses a host of Hassy equipment for the more formal shots. He says that as long as he can still get film and decent, reliable processing, he'll stay with film. Interestingly, He says that he actually caters to a higher end of the market now - seems film based photos are recognised by some as superior and worth the extra time and money. It's all about marketing.

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin