Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,900   Posts: 1,584,401   Online: 733
      
Page 14 of 18 FirstFirst ... 489101112131415161718 LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 172
  1. #131

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    16,887
    maybe i missed this ... but aren't most the landscapes ( "grand or notgrand" )basically the same thing - a photograph of a mundane scene ? i tend to "get" this photograph more than i do lanscapes, color or black and white.

    at least with the original photograph that was posted, one can see what the "world" was like - cars that were driven, what the utility poles were like, how badly the roads were kept up ( or still are ) what prefab or not prefab houses looked like, what curbing looked like ... i could go on and on. i am not saying that i am in love with this photograph, or understand where shore is coming from. as a record of what "there" was like it isn't bad.

  2. #132
    Markok765's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,270
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    24
    [QUOTE=Harrigan]
    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb
    I think that part of the meaning of the image comes from the fact that it is profoundly undramatic, non-heroic, and anti-Romantic. Shooting at the golden hour would work against that aspect.



    i think this is what the image is about to me. you dont have to shoot some super dramatic ripping red sunset to evoke meaning with images. this image is not about drama, super composition or color enhancing filters in fact quite the opposite. its profoundly undramatic, well put.
    I find it a boring, everyday "local street corner shot". Far to common. Nothing special about it IMHO.
    Marko Kovacevic
    Blog
    Youtube

  3. #133
    davetravis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Castle Rock, Co.
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    656
    yea.. all those nobodies.. shore, sternfeld, eggleston, meyerowitz, atget, misrach, freiedlander, winogrand (they're just normal people walking around), evans, kertesz, klein, strand, doisneau. most of their work are just 'snapshot's of the world around them

    Right!
    Yea, some you mention are "somebody," but not all.
    You see somebody, I see nobody.
    "The famous are seldom great, and the great are seldom famous."
    Wow, what a conversation over such a driffle of a photograph!
    I love APUG!

  4. #134
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,944
    Images
    60
    I've worked my way through this thread, and keep coming back to one thought.

    Maybe the problem is as much with the question, as it is with the photo itself.

    The question seems to imply that we only have two choices - "good" or "not good". I don't know whether that is in any way helpful.

    Now if the question was "Is this an interesting photo?" I might have less trouble with the question.

    I certainly think that the photo in question is one that is more likely to have subtle appeal, than to evoke a strong, instantaneous reaction.

    I also think that it is more likely to be interesting in real life, than on the monitor, because any interest is likely to flow from the tiny details, rather than the general appearance of a very static scene.

    On balance, and after looking at it a number of times, I think it is moderately interesting, but I don't think it would be the sort of photo that I would normally seek out.

    I certainly understand why many others would find that the photo holds no interest for them.

    It doesn't really matter to me that the photo and the photographer are both fairly well known, other than there may be a slight inclination to be more patient in coming to a decision about it - if others appreciate it, it may be worth a second look, in case something of value was overlooked on first impression.

    I thank you for initiating this thread. The discussion has probably been more interesting than the photo itself.

  5. #135

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Shenadoah Valley
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    342
    Images
    4
    [QUOTE=Markok765]
    Quote Originally Posted by Harrigan
    I find it a boring, everyday "local street corner shot". Far to common. Nothing special about it IMHO.

    exactly.

  6. #136

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by don sigl
    To each his own, but talking up a good intellectual argument for a book of snapshots doesn't make it anything more than a book of snapshots.
    Focusing on the cash ususally leads to compromise.
    Presumably the same goes for all the best art museums in the world? I'm assuming they just don't get it either?

  7. #137
    Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montréal (QC)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,351
    Images
    132
    Quote Originally Posted by JBrunner
    You should take a closer look at it
    Yeah, 137 acres surely isn't a trailer house... But the effect is the same, nonetheless!

    *Removes foot from mouth*
    Using film since before it was hip.


    "One of the most singular characters of the hyposulphites, is the property their solutions possess of dissolving muriate of silver and retaining it in considerable quantity in permanent solution" — Sir John Frederick William Herschel, "On the Hyposulphurous Acid and its Compounds." The Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, Vol. 1 (8 Jan. 1819): 8-29. p. 11

    My APUG Portfolio

  8. #138
    bjorke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    SF & Surrounding Planet
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,032
    Images
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by blansky
    What if I told you that 4 people were killed in that house. Two of them children.
    Assuming this is true, what does it have to do with the photograph?

    If you merely mean to reflect on the banality of suburbia against horror, well I don't think you quite hit it. Go back, shoot more. In some sustained way.

    KB
    (who used to live in a house in Topanga after the previous residents were eliminated in a full-family murder-suicide -- was a long cleanup job)

    "What Would Zeus Do?"
    KBPhotoRantPhotoPermitAPUG flickr Robot

  9. #139

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    16,887
    Quote Originally Posted by JBrunner
    You should take a closer look at it

    now that is pretty funny

  10. #140

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,512
    Images
    4
    I guess for me one of the more interesting aspects of this whole exercise is that if one of us anonymously posted such a photo and asked for a critique, we would probably be lambasted.

    But here we have an image by someone who has been crowned a landmark photographer by the powers that be, (or were) critics, curators and collectors from the 70s and 80s. As I have always said, artists don't decide what is Art, critics and collectors do.

    Photography, more so then any other medium is about time and place and because it is so based in reality, a particular image can receed into irrelevance over time. When I look at the book Uncommon Places I see a time capsule from when I was growing up. A a slice cut directly out of 70s middle class suburbia. For me, the importance of the book is simply documentary more then anything else. Any deeper meaning that Mr. Shore had is totally lost on me and was probably lost for most viewers younger then me about 1980. For someone born after the time of his book, the images just as well be 100 years old with about as much importance as looking at prints from old wet plates of wild west mining towns circa 1880. Simple artifacts and ephemera.

    Perhaps a relevant measure of how good an image is, is how well it holds its meaning or conveys a certain magic for the viewer many years after the image was made. If you use that measuring stick, the list is pretty small of photographers whose work will not be simply seen as records and curious artifacts from another time and place.
    "Fundamentally I think we need to rediscover a non-ironic world"
    Robert Adams



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin