Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,947   Posts: 1,557,852   Online: 797
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,360
    Images
    20
    As far as the personal ethical issues go, I agree that this would be a great tribute to your parents' work and their experience, and there wouldn't seem to be anyone else to do it, so I don't see any objections on those grounds. If your parents were cranky about letting other people print their negatives for aesthetic reasons like Brett Weston, you would probably know that, and you would probably have a nice set of fine prints to display, and wouldn't have any interest in the negatives.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  2. #12
    Alex Hawley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kansas, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,895
    Images
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb View Post
    If your parents were cranky about letting other people print their negatives for aesthetic reasons like Brett Weston, you would probably know that, and you would probably have a nice set of fine prints to display, and wouldn't have any interest in the negatives.
    No David, I don't recall any problem of that sort. I found the box containing the prints they had exhibited, but no care had been taken with them so they are in pretty bad shape. I don't think anyone had looked at them for thirty-plus years.

    Thanks for your advice.
    Semper Fi & God Bless America
    My Photography Blog

  3. #13
    Christopher Walrath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Milton, DE, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,980
    Blog Entries
    29
    Images
    19
    I say if your parents get full photo credit, go for it. What more fitting a legacy than if my son were to pick up MY torch after I passed on. So go ahead and pick up theirs.
    Thank you.
    CWalrath
    APUG BLIND PRINT EXCHANGE
    DE Darkroom

    "Wubba, wubba, wubba. Bing, bang, bong. Yuck, yuck, yuck and a fiddle-dee-dee." - The Yeti

  4. #14
    Greg Davis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Crestview Hills, KY
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,939
    Copyrights exist whether they were filed or not. Current copyrights are protected for 90 years after the death of the original artist or writer. Since you are the owner by inheretance, the copyright is yours now. It will continue to be yours for 90 years after your parents died, unless Congress extends it again. After that, they are public domain. If you know your parents wouldn't mind you printing them, then go for it. Legally, though, you are on solid ground.
    www.gregorytdavis.com

    Did millions of people suddenly disappear? This may have an answer.

    "No one knows that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father." -Matthew 24:36

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,558
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    8
    what a great idea alex
    maybe you should mark they with the photographer's name / printed by you ?
    that way they get credit for the camerawork and you get credit for
    the darkroomwork ...

    good luck!
    john

  6. #16
    SuzanneR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,740
    Images
    139
    Sounds like a worthwhile and entirely ethical project, Alex. I can only hope that my negatives are as well looked after by my kids and grandkids after I've made that leap!

    Post some of them as you work on it!

  7. #17
    John Bartley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    13 Critchley Avenue, PO Box 36, Monteith Ont, P0K1P0
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Hawley View Post
    ......
    I have been thinking about possibly exhibiting and offering for sale the best of these. I know this would be out of the question if it was work done by someone completely uconnected with me. Wouldn't even give it a thought. However, since the photographers were my parents and I have entirely legal posession of the negatives, what ethical questions would this raise? I would give due credit to them, only taking credit for the printing. .....
    I wouldn't want to debate a lawyer on a matter of law (I'd lose), but I think you had specified that you legally own the negatives. So, I would guess that legally they (the negatives) are yours to do with as you wish. The only "legal" impediments that I could see would be:
    • If your parents had sold the rights to the use of any specific negative ... the only way you'll know is to find the relevant "rights" document, or to hear about it after you print and someone objects ...
    • If you print them, sell the prints and pass them off as completely your own and get caught (I can't see you doing this so it's irrelevant).


    But ...... you didn't ask about "legal", you asked about "ethical" and seeing as you own the negatives, it seems that the only unethical thing you could do is leave the source of the negatives unmentioned or make the credit ambiguous when you print them (another pair of things that I can't see you doing), so why not go ahead and print them, give and take credit where due and be proud of your parents (and your own) work.

    cheers

    PS : this opinion is worth exactly what you paid for it

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin