Discussions: 45,159 | Messages: 608,972 | Members: 29,920 | Online: 310 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1107 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
636 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
953 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Ethics and Philosophy > How Analog is silver imaging really?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2007, 12:00 AM   #51 (permalink)
 
copake_ham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NYC or Copake or Tucson
Posts: 4,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhv View Post
* Analog is a misnomer
* Continuous tone is an illusion

Personally I like George's definition better: CHEMICAL photography, as opposed to ELECTRONIC photography. End of story.
Michel,

It's never "end of story" with threads like this.

There's always a Keith to throw ANOTHER log on the fire!

Some folk just don't have much of anything better to do in their life. Me, I do. I'm going to bed!
copake_ham is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-04-2007, 01:40 AM   #52 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DannL View Post
Stop it! That definition has nothing to do with photography. Nothing whatsoever. Did you even read the definition of an analog as it is found in chemistry? You should be ashamed of yourself. Go ahead, keep it up . . . Robert. One more attempt to misguide this class and I have everyone on the forum doing 100 push-ups. And guess who they'll have to thank for it.
That sure didn't come across well, now that I read it. It was intended as sarcasm. Here's what it should have said, for the record . . .

"That definition has nothing to do with photography."
DannL is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-04-2007, 01:49 AM   #53 (permalink)
 
MattKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Delta, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 2,463
Default

Sadly, I think that "Analogue Photography" is reactionary.

By that, I mean that the label "Analogue" is a reaction to the onset of electronic/digital based image capture. It is used in contradistinction to electronic/digital based systems.

The continuous tone nature of most non-electronic image capture systems is somewhat analogous to analogue based measurement systems (whew!) but both non-electronic image capture systems and electronic/digital based image capture systems result in useful analogues to reality (double whew!).

Isn't language wonderful?

Matt

P.S. I intentionally avoided the use of the word photography here, in an attempt to side step the "photography" excludes electronic/digital processes.
MattKing is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-04-2007, 02:41 AM   #54 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by copake_ham View Post
Can I be really quite honest with you?

You really are beginning to act like a troll on this thread . . . . . . And, in all honesty, I really couldn't give a darn if you don't like the term - so what? Who put you in charge?
George, It's not necessary to get all pissy, name calling, and protective of your rightful position in the hierarchy of this forum. Your position is safe. So with that, I promise not to address you if you would be so respectful as to do likewise. Cheers!
DannL is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-04-2007, 03:21 AM   #55 (permalink)
 
roteague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 6,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DannL View Post
Stop it! That definition has nothing to do with photography. Nothing whatsoever. Did you even read the definition of an analog as it is found in chemistry? You should be ashamed of yourself. Go ahead, keep it up . . . Robert. One more attempt to misguide this class and I have everyone on the forum doing 100 push-ups. And guess who they'll have to thank for it.
I'm tired of dealing with your issues. You are doing everything you can to concede a point. The definition doesn't have to do with photography, its only point is to show you that the term analog is used in ways other than in electronic circuits.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analog_photography
__________________
Robert M. Teague
www.visionlandscapes.com
www.apug.org/forums/portfolios.php?u=2235

"A man who works with his hands is a laborer; a man who works with his hands and his brain is a craftsman; a man who works with his hands and his brain and his heart is an artist" -- Louis Nizer
roteague is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 07-04-2007, 08:45 AM   #56 (permalink)
 
CPorter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: West KY
Posts: 815
Default

Analog?......... It's that smell of a box or roll of film when it is opened for the first time. Now that's analog.
__________________
"Photography is an illusion. It is amazing that human beings consider a photograph to be a representation of reality."
---John Sexton
CPorter is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-04-2007, 10:50 AM   #57 (permalink)
 
Daniel_OB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mississauga, Canada
Posts: 420
Default

Now I think that "analog photography" is a NEW AND IMPROVED name for photography.
The next step should be to remove someting from the name not to keep it so long, so
NEW AND IMPROVED name might be is "analography"
....

Just where ever I go I see that this time will be recorded as the worst time in human's history. Might be that TV and internet made that just all stupidity come on the surface, and even pushed it on higher energy level.

It is better for me to go into my printerless-chamber to make some analogopicts.
Daniel_OB is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-04-2007, 04:02 PM   #58 (permalink)
 
Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Montréal (QC)
Posts: 3,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DannL View Post
That sure didn't come across well, now that I read it. It was intended as sarcasm. Here's what it should have said, for the record . . .

"That definition has nothing to do with photography."

Well, DUH! You just agreed with my explanation that "analog" had NEVER anything to do with photography until recently. Why do you complain?
__________________
Using film since before it was hip.
Michel Hardy-Vallée is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-04-2007, 04:04 PM   #59 (permalink)
 
Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Montréal (QC)
Posts: 3,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by copake_ham View Post
Michel,

It's never "end of story" with threads like this.

There's always a Keith to throw ANOTHER log on the fire!

Some folk just don't have much of anything better to do in their life. Me, I do. I'm going to bed!
Seems not. From now on I will only use a private language of my own, which has the amazing property of having no ambiguities, and describes each object perfectly in its individuality.

Ugls flughs drty, wopsk nuffgh op, stad nap man dodo cokomok, y to ypu mo nomgyfthuw.
__________________
Using film since before it was hip.
Michel Hardy-Vallée is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-09-2007, 10:42 AM   #60 (permalink)
mjs
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Elkhart, Indiana (USA)
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RossJarvis View Post
Sorry if this has been discussed before
It's just a label... Most labels are fairly random and don't carry much meaning beyond what they accumulate later. Don't let it throw you.

mjs
mjs is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using