Discussions: 45,159 | Messages: 608,971 | Members: 29,919 | Online: 323 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1107 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
636 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
953 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Ethics and Philosophy > Film and the bobo ethos

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-12-2007, 10:28 PM   #51 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 348
Default

My wife works in advertising, and we get ad-type publications, like Communication Arts, etc. So we saw the trend toward b&w and the grainy film look coming a long time ago. As a photographer, I was seriously distressed to see so many pictures in galleries with the "contact print" edges showing, or the little Hassy notches ever-so-subtly evident. And this was ten years ago, before film began its recent decline. The cachet of authenticity of b&w film seems to go back to around the time Starbucks and Pottery Barn got up and running. It was only twenty years ago that b&w fine art prints started to be considered by the wider art buying public as worth investing serious money in.

Cultural innovation is always co-opted and followed by gentrification. The real bo-hos paint in agony, strung out on heroin and caffeine in their SoHo lofts or on the edge of the Mission District, not making the rent, not getting the attention of the galleries, and then when the mainstream catches up with their vision, the Range Rover crowd moves into the neighborhood and exalts the artist's contribution and the cycle starts over somewhere else.

The longer I look at the way the world seems to work, the more I think Deepthroat had it right: "Follow the money."
__________________
Robert Hunt
rhphoto is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-13-2007, 10:35 AM   #52 (permalink)
 
Ed Sukach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 4,106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ole View Post
Not true everywhere, Ed. Certainly not around here.
What is "not true"?

If you mean the cost of Brook (or other) trout, I'd have to include air fare, lodging, meals ...

I figure - all in all -- somewhere around US$ 987.13/ ounce.

Not really worth it - BUT .... some day....
__________________
Carpe erratum!!

Ed Sukach, FFP.
Ed Sukach is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-13-2007, 11:00 AM   #53 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 174
Default

"Not true everywhere, Ed. Certainly not around here."

Here neither. Nor the last place I lived. I used to cross-country ski to school in the winter. Over frozen brooks. On borrowed skis. Saved me a little on gas.

But Ed, you're not so far from New England there in Eastern Mass- why not bring a tent?
laverdure is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using