Discussions: 44,952 | Messages: 605,999 | Members: 29,704 | Online: 391 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar

untitled

by Chris Breitenstein
Enter the Gallery
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
842 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
370 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
791 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Ethics and Philosophy > Are photoghraphers really a threat?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-21-2008, 01:08 AM   #41 (permalink)
 
gr82bart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Haven and Toronto
Posts: 4,585
Default

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main...tographers.xml

It's only going to get worse.

Regards, Art.
__________________
Visit my website at www.ArtLiem.com
or my online portfolios at APUG and ModelMayhem
gr82bart is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-21-2008, 01:21 AM   #42 (permalink)
 
bowzart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 473
Default

I was photographing in a mall in Seattle on assignment for Sunset Magazine - quite a long time ago. Inclusion in a story was worth at least $25k, should the photographs be included, in FREE advertising value. It was a tremendously popular magazine that people read to figure out where to go, what to live in, how to grow things in the garden, what to eat.... I mean, whole businesses, even towns, could prosper with an opportunity like that. I could cite examples that could be easily verified.

I was in a fabric store. They asked me to leave. I explained what I was doing. Too bad, they said, it was against company policy.

I wonder how the administration thought about it after I left and they found out. Their loss. Too bad...
bowzart is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-21-2008, 02:26 AM   #43 (permalink)
 
TheDreadPirateRobins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 165
Default

There is some paranoia here in my town (Portland, Oregon, USA) among some of the chemical plant and petroleum distribution site owners about people with cameras. I have heard more than one account of a photographer being hassled while taking pictures of some of the industrial landscapes available. I had a guy at a public meeting who said he owned "a chemical plant" that he was opposing bicycle lanes on the streets because that would bring more photographers, and photographers had been seen around his plant, some of them were "Middle Eastern looking" and were driving SUV's.

I suggested that he ban SUV's from streets near his plant, since that seemed to be the vehicle of choice for this sinister element. He barked at me loudly about how I wasn't taking threats seriously and I asked him if he'd like to come over to my house and tell that to my half-Lebanese wife who is damn tired of getting the "random security check" at airports nearly every time she flies.
TheDreadPirateRobins is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using