Discussions: 45,159 | Messages: 608,972 | Members: 29,919 | Online: 310 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1107 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
636 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
953 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Ethics and Philosophy > Large format photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-19-2008, 10:11 AM   #41 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valerie View Post
I just started using a large format camera after many years of 35 mm and MF. I adore the long process of setting up my big camera for a shot. Like extra-long foreplay instead of a quickie! Both can be satisfying in the end. Its not about the superiority of one or another... its the entire act of creating.


But, Valerie, you've actually nailed it perfectly. For me it's about the process. I enjoy creating my 5x7" photos much more than I have enjoyed capturing them on 6x7cm.

And in the 2 years I'm using LF, I think I have learned (and gained) much more than in the 6 years of small/medium format shooting. And I'm still enjoying this learning process.
__________________
Jiri Vasina
www.vasina.net
poutnik is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-19-2008, 11:02 AM   #42 (permalink)
 
David Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Les McLean View Post
I wonder what the difference in the American description of 8 x 10 to the UK use of 10 x 8 has on this in relation to the "repressed sexual inadequacy" that Dave refers too. Is it significant that across the pond the smaller size comes first?
No. You gentlemen also drive on the wrong side!
__________________
David Brown
In Nomine Papierus, Filmio, et Spiritu Argentine, AMEN
David Brown is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-19-2008, 11:04 AM   #43 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Coast, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,724
Default

I'm so large format they call me Tripod

Murray
__________________
_________________________________________
Note to self: Turn your negatives into positives.
MurrayMinchin is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-19-2008, 12:11 PM   #44 (permalink)
 
Steve Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ryde, Isle of Wight, England
Posts: 2,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Brown View Post
No. You gentlemen also drive on the wrong side!
We have other ideas on that theory!


Steve.
Steve Smith is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-19-2008, 12:49 PM   #45 (permalink)
 
Andy K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sunny Southend, England.
Posts: 7,072
Default

Interesting aside, driving on the right originated in post revolution France. Previously the gentry travelled on the left of the road and the peasantry on the right. Once the revolution came along, to avoid a severely close shave from madame la guillotine, everyone travelled on the right.
__________________


-----------My Flickr-----------
The Earth has music for those who listen
Andy K is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 07-19-2008, 01:31 PM   #46 (permalink)
 
Shmoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 865
Default

As most of us women know, it's not the size of the equipment...it's how you use it!
__________________
Save the Earth. It's the only planet with chocolate.
Shmoo is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-19-2008, 03:23 PM   #47 (permalink)
 
Anupam Basu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Miller View Post
Since there is little to be gained in terms of image quality ...
Um, that's where you lost me. What's "smaller format"? 35mm? half-frame? 6x7? If you're shooting 8x10 and not noticing any gain in terms of image quality, work on your technique instead of pondering other people's sexual inadequacy.
__________________
My Website and Gallery
Anupam Basu is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-19-2008, 03:40 PM   #48 (permalink)
 
Ian Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 4,676
Default

I've come to realise that Dave Miller has a lot in common with Barry Thornton who he admires - well maybe not a lot in common just a little - his scorn for LF. Reading Thornton's Edge of Darkness, I can see the same envy for those who have mastery of larger formats. Thornton was an SL66 user and makes sure you know that.

Almost same vein of dismissive comments: "Since there is little to be gained in terms of image quality over smaller formats, and much is lost in the way of portability and spontaneity, it seems to me that the possession of a large camera, such as a 10x8 can only represent a form of repressed sexual inadequacy. Would anyone care to comment?"

Well it's generally accepted that LF cameras are 5"x4" and larger so what should we really be saying, or asking.

Ian
Ian Grant is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-19-2008, 04:00 PM   #49 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
Well it's generally accepted that LF cameras are 5"x4" and larger so what should we really be saying, or asking.
Ian
Se my first post in this thread. 8x10 has its place as do all formats. But I seriously question the need for 8x10 for the work that most people do. But I also think you have to remember that most people on this forum are enthusiasts and not professional jobbing photographers. As such, anything goes. Who is to say that someone else should not be using 8x10 if they are into old cameras and lenses and enjoy using them. Trying to pass that off as "a form of repressed sexual inadequacy" is immature in the extreme.

Incidentally I met Barry Thorton on a couple of occasions at workshops he gave. He was a pedant and prone to ranting at his students. I pulled out of a series of his workshops because of his attitude. I know of others who didn't see eye to eye with him or his methods. However, he was very willing to share his knowledge with others if they obeyed his dictatums. In the greater scheme of things there are many ways to achieve the same thing and understanding where others are coming from is a life skill which some never master.
rob champagne is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-19-2008, 04:07 PM   #50 (permalink)
 
Anupam Basu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob champagne View Post
But I seriously question the need for 8x10 for the work that most people do.
True. I do 4x5 because it's the largest format that you can enlarge with reasonable equipment and also because a well put together 4x5 setup rivals similar MF or even DSLR setups in terms of weight - you can't get a 90 or 150mm lens that weighs between 150-200gms for those.

8x10, on the other hand is the sweet spot for contact printers - the ideal compromise between contact print size and portability.
__________________
My Website and Gallery
Anupam Basu is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using