|
|
|
-
Flattery or theft?
Does this photograph:

look anywhere close to this one:
aristotelis grammatikakis
www.arigram.gr
Real photographs, created in camera, 100% organic,
no digital additives and shit
-
All I know is I don't want to be anywhere close to either of them!:rolleyes:
-
 Originally Posted by lxdude
All I know is I don't want to be anywhere close to either of them!:rolleyes:
What's that supposed to mean?
aristotelis grammatikakis
www.arigram.gr
Real photographs, created in camera, 100% organic,
no digital additives and shit
-
Sorry, I don't read Greek, but is that magazine page an ad for a new way to polish floors?
-
Aside from the fact that both models are wearing wings, no.
-
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
-
Neither. Something else ...
They're both a take off of this IMO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rRseLDqNNI 'Cept I like the VS models, styling, art direction, etc... much better.
Artists like to think they are the originator of a first and true idea. Not. It's all been done before and t-shirts have been sold out long ago.
Sorry, here are some more: http://images.google.com/images?q=ma...N&hl=en&tab=wi
Regards, Art.
Last edited by gr82bart; 02-06-2010 at 06:38 PM.
-
Here's an angel not to be messed with circa 1872 by Julia Margaret Cameron.
-
These pictures are sufficiently different.
-
I don't see any similarity beyond the obvious cliche of a mortal wearing faux angel wings.
-
A few thousand years ago they used to do statues of Greek gods. Go figure.
|
|