Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,274   Posts: 1,534,656   Online: 1108
      
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    9

    istockphotos.com --> too cheap?

    With web designers and others being able to purchase stock photographs from places like istockphotos.com for as cheap as $.50/photo, does that take away from what we do? How does the internet, specifically sites like this affect our profession? Is it a good thing, to have more exposure, or is it bad, with market saturation?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,235
    Images
    9
    Of course the market is saturated. But I do not think these sites will hurt the profession. If these sites were what the doctor ordered why are there folks like Jody Dole who seem to have no problem getting photos. There are editors out there who are willing to pay for what they want. If they want something generic they go to the buttloadophotos.com or genericphoto.com type of places and pick it up cheap. If they need a specific shot that can only be achieved by a specific photographer then that is where they go look.

    Maybe the market will be harder to break into if these are the types of shots you are taking but elbow grease and paying your dues does pay off. Of course being a damn good photog with an original eye helps a hell of a lot.
    Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI

    So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin