Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,979   Posts: 1,523,738   Online: 1145
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    CGW
    CGW is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,798
    Quote Originally Posted by hoffy View Post
    Do you have any examples?

    I have the 150 F4 and I have to admit that I am a little disappointed with the minimum focal distance of it. My version also has a problem, where it doesn't fire the flash (which I will get fixed...hopefully).

    Also, any reason why the 110 F4.5 PS is so much more expensive then the F4 version?
    The f4.5 close focuses to .37m and delivers 1/1 without a tube. Believe it also has a larger 72mm filter size. It was around US$2150 new and about 400 now if you can find one.

  2. #12
    NJS
    NJS is offline
    NJS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    125
    150/3.5 would be my recommendation. I have both S and PS versions of 150mm and 3.5S version has definitely more pleasing character (OoF, smooth contrasts, etc. etc.). haven't noticed any difference in sharpness between the two.

    for tight close-ups S-16 extension tube is the way to go.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin